Adhesive capsulitis; evaluation of a recently introduced MRI criterion

IF 1.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Samin Khoei, M. Malek, Mohaddeseh Azadvari, Nima Bagheri
{"title":"Adhesive capsulitis; evaluation of a recently introduced MRI criterion","authors":"Samin Khoei, M. Malek, Mohaddeseh Azadvari, Nima Bagheri","doi":"10.34172/ipp.2022.34438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Adhesive capsulitis is a common disorder, defined as the painful limitation of glenohumeral range of motion due to capsular hyperplasia and fibrosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – as the gold standard of shoulder imaging- plays a critical role in diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis, in the early stages. The anterior predominance of pathologic and arthroscopic abnormalities suggest that the thickness of anterior joint capsule may be a more reliable diagnostic criterion on MRI; however, to our knowledge, only one study has evaluated the significance of this parameter up to now, the results of which, may be subject to substantial bias, due to small sample size. Objectives: To evaluate the anterior capsule of glenohumeral joint, in terms of thickness and signal intensity, and also to conduct a comparison between adhesive capsulitis subjects and control individuals. Materials and Methods: This is a case-control study. Cases were all patients with the final diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis, based on history, physical examination and imaging. Controls were all patients who underwent shoulder MRI, because of another reason. Anterior capsular thickness, and other qualitative and quantitative criteria were evaluated on the MRIs, by two musculoskeletal radiologists, with three and 10 years experience respectively. Results: All of the evaluated criteria showed significant difference, between cases and controls. Considering the cut-off point equal to 1.3 mm, \"anterior capsular thickness\" had 86.7% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity, 96.3% positive and 87.9% negative predictive values respectively, which posed an acceptable position among MRI criteria of adhesive capsulitis. Of note, was the near perfect inter-observer agreement of this criterion between the two radiologists, implicating its practicality. Conclusion: The anterior capsule signal and thickness are valuable criteria for diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis on MRI. Future studies with large sample volumes, clinical sub-categorization of the patients and multivariate analysis are recommended to more accurately define its role in MRI-based diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis.","PeriodicalId":13454,"journal":{"name":"Immunopathologia Persa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunopathologia Persa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ipp.2022.34438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adhesive capsulitis is a common disorder, defined as the painful limitation of glenohumeral range of motion due to capsular hyperplasia and fibrosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – as the gold standard of shoulder imaging- plays a critical role in diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis, in the early stages. The anterior predominance of pathologic and arthroscopic abnormalities suggest that the thickness of anterior joint capsule may be a more reliable diagnostic criterion on MRI; however, to our knowledge, only one study has evaluated the significance of this parameter up to now, the results of which, may be subject to substantial bias, due to small sample size. Objectives: To evaluate the anterior capsule of glenohumeral joint, in terms of thickness and signal intensity, and also to conduct a comparison between adhesive capsulitis subjects and control individuals. Materials and Methods: This is a case-control study. Cases were all patients with the final diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis, based on history, physical examination and imaging. Controls were all patients who underwent shoulder MRI, because of another reason. Anterior capsular thickness, and other qualitative and quantitative criteria were evaluated on the MRIs, by two musculoskeletal radiologists, with three and 10 years experience respectively. Results: All of the evaluated criteria showed significant difference, between cases and controls. Considering the cut-off point equal to 1.3 mm, "anterior capsular thickness" had 86.7% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity, 96.3% positive and 87.9% negative predictive values respectively, which posed an acceptable position among MRI criteria of adhesive capsulitis. Of note, was the near perfect inter-observer agreement of this criterion between the two radiologists, implicating its practicality. Conclusion: The anterior capsule signal and thickness are valuable criteria for diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis on MRI. Future studies with large sample volumes, clinical sub-categorization of the patients and multivariate analysis are recommended to more accurately define its role in MRI-based diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis.
胶囊炎;对最近引入的MRI标准的评价
粘连性肩关节囊炎是一种常见疾病,定义为肩关节囊增生和纤维化导致肩关节活动度受限。磁共振成像(MRI)作为肩部成像的金标准,在粘连性囊炎的早期诊断中起着至关重要的作用。病理和关节镜异常的前侧优势提示前关节囊的厚度可能是MRI上更可靠的诊断标准;然而,据我们所知,目前只有一项研究对该参数的显著性进行了评估,由于样本量较小,评估结果可能存在较大偏差。目的:评价盂肱关节前囊的厚度和信号强度,并对粘连性囊炎患者与对照组进行比较。材料与方法:本研究为病例对照研究。病例均为经病史、体格检查及影像学检查最终诊断为粘连性囊炎的患者。由于另一个原因,对照组是所有接受肩部核磁共振的患者。前囊厚度和其他定性和定量标准由两名分别具有3年和10年经验的肌肉骨骼放射科医生在mri上进行评估。结果:病例与对照组间各项评价指标均有显著性差异。考虑到截断点为1.3 mm,“前囊厚度”的敏感性为86.7%,特异性为96.7%,阳性预测值为96.3%,阴性预测值为87.9%,在粘连性囊炎的MRI诊断标准中处于可接受的位置。值得注意的是,两名放射科医生对这一标准几乎达成了完美的共识,这意味着它的实用性。结论:前囊信号及厚度是诊断粘连性囊炎的重要指标。建议今后开展大样本量的研究,对患者进行临床亚分类,并进行多因素分析,以更准确地确定其在粘连性囊炎mri诊断中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信