Stereotypical Images of Ukrainians and Russians in a HumanitarianCrisis: Multicultural Perspectives

Agnieszka Szewczyk - Zakrzewska, S. Avsec
{"title":"Stereotypical Images of Ukrainians and Russians in a HumanitarianCrisis: Multicultural Perspectives","authors":"Agnieszka Szewczyk - Zakrzewska, S. Avsec","doi":"10.35765/hw.2023.2261.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article aims to map the stereotypical image of Ukrainians and Russians from a cross-cultural perspective in the context of the ongoing armed conflict. \nRESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem concerns the cultural differences that are revealed in the perception of representatives of the two nationalities that are involved in the armed conflict. Since stereotypical judgements are most often revealed in language, an adjective check list was used for the study. A sample of 92 Polish and Slovenian students took part in the study. The collected linguistic material was used to analyse and compare cross-cultural stereotypical judgements about Ukrainian and Russian citizens. \nTHE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The argument begins with theoretical perspectives on the concept of stereotyping and the process of stereotyping. The role of language in the stereotyping process is analysed. An analysis of the results and conclusions is presented. \nRESEARCHRESULTS: In general, Polish students attribute fewer positive adjectives than Slovenian students to both Ukrainians and Russians. The analysis revealed significant statistical differences as well as similarities between the researched groups of Polish and Slovenian students in terms of the stereotypical image of Ukrainians and Russians. \nCONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: Empirical evidence shows that Polish and Slovenian students have more in common in their perception of Russians, while they perceive Ukrainians quite differently. The linguistic characteristics obtained in this study provide a general insight into the perceptions of the two nationalities involved in the war. It should also be noted that these characteristics of Ukrainians and Russians may constitute socially important knowledge on the negative stereotypes about these nationalities. This knowledge may be useful in challenging counteracting or disseminating such judgements, which may be harmful and lead to prejudice or discrimination against people from the nationalities studied. \n ","PeriodicalId":53094,"journal":{"name":"Horyzonty Wychowania","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horyzonty Wychowania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2023.2261.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article aims to map the stereotypical image of Ukrainians and Russians from a cross-cultural perspective in the context of the ongoing armed conflict. RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem concerns the cultural differences that are revealed in the perception of representatives of the two nationalities that are involved in the armed conflict. Since stereotypical judgements are most often revealed in language, an adjective check list was used for the study. A sample of 92 Polish and Slovenian students took part in the study. The collected linguistic material was used to analyse and compare cross-cultural stereotypical judgements about Ukrainian and Russian citizens. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The argument begins with theoretical perspectives on the concept of stereotyping and the process of stereotyping. The role of language in the stereotyping process is analysed. An analysis of the results and conclusions is presented. RESEARCHRESULTS: In general, Polish students attribute fewer positive adjectives than Slovenian students to both Ukrainians and Russians. The analysis revealed significant statistical differences as well as similarities between the researched groups of Polish and Slovenian students in terms of the stereotypical image of Ukrainians and Russians. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: Empirical evidence shows that Polish and Slovenian students have more in common in their perception of Russians, while they perceive Ukrainians quite differently. The linguistic characteristics obtained in this study provide a general insight into the perceptions of the two nationalities involved in the war. It should also be noted that these characteristics of Ukrainians and Russians may constitute socially important knowledge on the negative stereotypes about these nationalities. This knowledge may be useful in challenging counteracting or disseminating such judgements, which may be harmful and lead to prejudice or discrimination against people from the nationalities studied.  
人道主义危机中乌克兰人和俄罗斯人的刻板形象:多元文化视角
研究目的:本文旨在从跨文化视角在持续的武装冲突背景下绘制乌克兰人和俄罗斯人的刻板形象。研究问题和方法:研究问题涉及参与武装冲突的两个民族的代表在感知中所揭示的文化差异。由于刻板印象最常在语言中表现出来,因此研究中使用了一个形容词检查表。92名波兰和斯洛文尼亚学生参加了这项研究。收集的语言材料用于分析和比较关于乌克兰和俄罗斯公民的跨文化刻板印象判断。论证过程:论证从刻板印象概念和刻板印象过程的理论视角开始。分析了语言在刻板印象过程中的作用。对结果和结论进行了分析。研究结果:总体而言,波兰学生对乌克兰人和俄罗斯人的褒义词都少于斯洛文尼亚学生。分析显示,波兰和斯洛文尼亚两组学生对乌克兰人和俄罗斯人的刻板印象有显著的统计差异,也有相似之处。结论、创新、建议:经验证据表明,波兰和斯洛文尼亚学生在对俄罗斯人的看法上有更多的共同点,而他们对乌克兰人的看法则截然不同。本研究获得的语言特征提供了对参与战争的两个民族的看法的总体见解。还应当指出,乌克兰人和俄罗斯人的这些特征可能构成对这些民族的负面刻板印象的重要社会知识。这方面的知识可能有助于挑战、抵制或传播这些判断,因为这些判断可能是有害的,并导致对所研究的民族的人产生偏见或歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信