Antibiotic prescribing among elderly living in long-term care facilities versus elderly living at home: a Danish registry-based study

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hadir Azaizi, Maria Louise Veimer Jensen, Ida Scheel Rasmussen, J. Jarløv, Jette Nygaard Jensen
{"title":"Antibiotic prescribing among elderly living in long-term care facilities versus elderly living at home: a Danish registry-based study","authors":"Hadir Azaizi, Maria Louise Veimer Jensen, Ida Scheel Rasmussen, J. Jarløv, Jette Nygaard Jensen","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2022.2076903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The objective of this study was to compare antibiotic prescription rates in Denmark among elderly living in long-term care facilities to elderly living at home, with regards to total antibiotic use and antibiotic use for urinary tract infection. Methods This is an observational registry-based study. The study population included all elderly Danish residents aged ≥75 years in 2016. Linear regression models were used to examine the difference in antibiotic prescription rates between elderly living in long-term care facilities and elderly living at home. Results were adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity, the latter assessed via the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results The study population consisted of 416,627 elderly. Regression models showed that elderly living in long-term care facilities were prescribed 1.7 [CI 1.7–1.7] prescriptions/individual/year more than elderly living at home. For urinary tract infections the difference between elderly living in long-term care facilities and elderly living at home was 1.2 [CI 1.2–1.3] prescriptions/individual/year. Conclusions Elderly living in long-term care facilities have a higher antibiotic prescribing rate than elderly living at home, despite controlling for age, sex and comorbidity. This indicates that long-term care facilities continuously should be a focus for antibiotic stewardship interventions.","PeriodicalId":13671,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases","volume":"54 1","pages":"651 - 655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2022.2076903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to compare antibiotic prescription rates in Denmark among elderly living in long-term care facilities to elderly living at home, with regards to total antibiotic use and antibiotic use for urinary tract infection. Methods This is an observational registry-based study. The study population included all elderly Danish residents aged ≥75 years in 2016. Linear regression models were used to examine the difference in antibiotic prescription rates between elderly living in long-term care facilities and elderly living at home. Results were adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity, the latter assessed via the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results The study population consisted of 416,627 elderly. Regression models showed that elderly living in long-term care facilities were prescribed 1.7 [CI 1.7–1.7] prescriptions/individual/year more than elderly living at home. For urinary tract infections the difference between elderly living in long-term care facilities and elderly living at home was 1.2 [CI 1.2–1.3] prescriptions/individual/year. Conclusions Elderly living in long-term care facilities have a higher antibiotic prescribing rate than elderly living at home, despite controlling for age, sex and comorbidity. This indicates that long-term care facilities continuously should be a focus for antibiotic stewardship interventions.
长期护理机构老年人与居家老年人的抗生素处方:一项基于丹麦注册的研究
摘要背景本研究的目的是比较丹麦长期护理机构老年人和居家老年人的抗生素处方率,包括抗生素的总使用量和尿路感染的抗生素使用量。方法这是一项基于观察注册表的研究。研究人群包括所有年龄≥75岁的丹麦老年居民 年。使用线性回归模型来检验居住在长期护理机构的老年人和居住在家中的老年人之间抗生素处方率的差异。结果根据年龄、性别和合并症进行了调整,后者通过Charlson合并症指数进行评估。结果研究人群包括416627名老年人。回归模型显示,居住在长期护理机构的老年人比居住在家中的老年人每年多开1.7张处方[CI 1.7-1.7]。对于尿路感染,居住在长期护理机构的老年人和居住在家中的老年人之间的差异为1.2[CI 1.2–1.3]处方/个人/年。结论尽管控制了年龄、性别和合并症,但居住在长期护理机构的老年人的抗生素处方率高于居住在家中的老年人。这表明长期护理机构应继续成为抗生素管理干预措施的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases
Infectious Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
92
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases (formerly Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on all aspects of human infection, including pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, and also on medical microbiology and epidemiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信