A Methodology for Determining and Validating Latent Factor Dimensionality of Complex Multi-Factor Science Constructs Measuring Knowledge-In-Use

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Leonora Kaldaras, Hope O. Akaeze, J. Krajcik
{"title":"A Methodology for Determining and Validating Latent Factor Dimensionality of Complex Multi-Factor Science Constructs Measuring Knowledge-In-Use","authors":"Leonora Kaldaras, Hope O. Akaeze, J. Krajcik","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2021.1971966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Deep science understanding is reflected in students’ ability to use content and skills when making sense of the world. Assessing deep understanding requires measuring complex constructs that combine elements of content and skills. To develop valid measures of complex constructs, we need to understand how their theoretical dimensionality, reflected in the integration of content and skills, is manifested in practice. This work is developed in the context of the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next-Generation Science Standards (NGSS). We introduce a methodology that describes steps for creating a theoretical validity argument for measuring complex NGSS constructs, designing operational assessments based on this argument, and obtaining empirical evidence for the validity of the argument and assessments, focusing on how theoretically suggested dimensionality of NGSS constructs is manifested in practice. Results have implications for developing valid NGSS assessments and reporting student progress on high-stakes and diagnostic evaluation.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"26 1","pages":"241 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2021.1971966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Deep science understanding is reflected in students’ ability to use content and skills when making sense of the world. Assessing deep understanding requires measuring complex constructs that combine elements of content and skills. To develop valid measures of complex constructs, we need to understand how their theoretical dimensionality, reflected in the integration of content and skills, is manifested in practice. This work is developed in the context of the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next-Generation Science Standards (NGSS). We introduce a methodology that describes steps for creating a theoretical validity argument for measuring complex NGSS constructs, designing operational assessments based on this argument, and obtaining empirical evidence for the validity of the argument and assessments, focusing on how theoretically suggested dimensionality of NGSS constructs is manifested in practice. Results have implications for developing valid NGSS assessments and reporting student progress on high-stakes and diagnostic evaluation.
复杂多因素科学结构中潜在因素维度的确定与验证方法
深刻的科学理解体现在学生在理解世界时运用内容和技能的能力上。评估深度理解需要测量结合内容和技能元素的复杂结构。为了开发复杂构念的有效测量方法,我们需要了解它们的理论维度(反映在内容和技能的整合中)是如何在实践中表现出来的。这项工作是在K-12科学教育框架和下一代科学标准(NGSS)的背景下开展的。我们介绍了一种方法,该方法描述了为测量复杂NGSS结构创建理论有效性论证的步骤,设计基于该论证的操作评估,以及获得论证和评估有效性的经验证据,重点关注理论建议的NGSS结构维度如何在实践中得到体现。研究结果对制定有效的NGSS评估和报告学生在高风险和诊断性评估方面的进展具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信