“Did you read about Berlin?” Terrorist attacks, online media reporting and support for refugees in Germany

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran, Christian S. Czymara
{"title":"“Did you read about Berlin?” Terrorist attacks, online media reporting and support for refugees in Germany","authors":"Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran, Christian S. Czymara","doi":"10.5771/0038-6073-2020-1-2-201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze whether the Islamist terror attack on the Christmas market in Berlin in 2016 had an impact on public opinion toward immigration in general and, since the attacker has entered Germany to apply for asylum, toward refugees in particular. An analysis of this natural experiment reveals a negative shift regarding the latter, while no differences are observed for the former. To shed more light on the driver of attitude change, we combine these findings with a quantitative content analysis of online media reporting about refugees before and after the attack. Mass media have long been considered to have an impact on exclusionary attitudes toward ethnic minorities. However, empirical evidence on this relationship remains largely anecdotal. We draw upon unsupervised machine learning to quantify the developments in reporting in three popular German online news websites. Results reveal that the attack had significant impact on media reporting on these websites. However, the strong focus on the attack was only short lived, quickly decreasing already in the second week after the attack. Linking media data to the public opinion data reveals no clear connection between reporting and attitudes. In contrast to theoretical expectations, descriptive evidence even shows that both follow almost opposite trends, since people changed their attitudes only weeks after the attack. We discuss potential explanations of these, at first sight, counterintuitive findings.","PeriodicalId":45144,"journal":{"name":"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2020-1-2-201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We analyze whether the Islamist terror attack on the Christmas market in Berlin in 2016 had an impact on public opinion toward immigration in general and, since the attacker has entered Germany to apply for asylum, toward refugees in particular. An analysis of this natural experiment reveals a negative shift regarding the latter, while no differences are observed for the former. To shed more light on the driver of attitude change, we combine these findings with a quantitative content analysis of online media reporting about refugees before and after the attack. Mass media have long been considered to have an impact on exclusionary attitudes toward ethnic minorities. However, empirical evidence on this relationship remains largely anecdotal. We draw upon unsupervised machine learning to quantify the developments in reporting in three popular German online news websites. Results reveal that the attack had significant impact on media reporting on these websites. However, the strong focus on the attack was only short lived, quickly decreasing already in the second week after the attack. Linking media data to the public opinion data reveals no clear connection between reporting and attitudes. In contrast to theoretical expectations, descriptive evidence even shows that both follow almost opposite trends, since people changed their attitudes only weeks after the attack. We discuss potential explanations of these, at first sight, counterintuitive findings.
“你读过关于柏林的报道吗?”恐怖袭击、网络媒体报道和对德国难民的支持
我们分析了2016年柏林圣诞市场发生的伊斯兰恐怖袭击是否对公众对移民的看法产生了影响,因为袭击者进入德国是为了申请庇护,尤其是对难民的看法。对这一自然实验的分析揭示了后者的负面变化,而前者没有观察到差异。为了进一步了解态度变化的驱动因素,我们将这些发现与袭击前后网络媒体关于难民报道的定量内容分析相结合。长期以来,大众媒体一直被认为对少数民族的排斥态度有影响。然而,关于这种关系的经验证据在很大程度上仍然是轶事。我们利用无监督机器学习来量化三个流行的德国在线新闻网站的报道发展。结果显示,这次攻击对这些网站的媒体报道产生了重大影响。然而,对袭击的强烈关注只是短暂的,在袭击后的第二周就已经迅速减少。将媒体数据与公众舆论数据联系起来,并没有发现报道与态度之间有明确的联系。与理论预期相反,描述性证据甚至表明,两者的趋势几乎相反,因为人们在袭击发生几周后才改变了态度。我们讨论了这些乍一看是违反直觉的发现的潜在解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Soziale Welt is one of the important journals within German sociology and is even read in foreign countries. It includes empirical and theoretical contributions from all areas of the subject and tries to portray the development of sociology and to give a new impetus. In addition to the quarterly published issues, there are special issues with a unified theme. The journal "Soziale Welt" is aimed at sociologists, social scientists, and at generally interested readers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信