A tutorial on norming linguistic stimuli for clinical populations

Oliver Delgaram-Nejad , Gerasimos Chatzidamianos , Dawn Archer , Alex Bartha , Louise Robinson
{"title":"A tutorial on norming linguistic stimuli for clinical populations","authors":"Oliver Delgaram-Nejad ,&nbsp;Gerasimos Chatzidamianos ,&nbsp;Dawn Archer ,&nbsp;Alex Bartha ,&nbsp;Louise Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2022.100022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stimuli norming (the process of controlling experimental items to minimise bias) is important for the validity of psycholinguistic experiments. Survey norming (asking large numbers of people to rate or otherwise define the items) is typically used for this purpose but requires large samples. Clinical populations are not always large, nor easy to reach. Clinical participants often have ongoing symptomatology, and some cohorts experience language and communication difficulties. We present a corpus-linguistic method suitable for clinical populations for which survey norming is difficult or inappropriate. We also include the experiment generated, which measures metaphor-creation behaviour in schizophrenia to test Cognitive Constraint Theory (CCT) in clinical and nonclinical populations (see S2.1). We describe the design rationale before outlining the design stages in tutorial form. This allows us to show readers why the approach was needed and support them to consider and respond to the challenges that we encountered. We conclude that it is easier to consider norming and design practices in parallel when experimental units are defined linguistically. Corpus stimuli norming provides a versatile alternative when survey norming is prohibitive, especially in speech pathology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799122000077/pdfft?md5=40b8aaab346c1faa805c35598a6254f4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666799122000077-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799122000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stimuli norming (the process of controlling experimental items to minimise bias) is important for the validity of psycholinguistic experiments. Survey norming (asking large numbers of people to rate or otherwise define the items) is typically used for this purpose but requires large samples. Clinical populations are not always large, nor easy to reach. Clinical participants often have ongoing symptomatology, and some cohorts experience language and communication difficulties. We present a corpus-linguistic method suitable for clinical populations for which survey norming is difficult or inappropriate. We also include the experiment generated, which measures metaphor-creation behaviour in schizophrenia to test Cognitive Constraint Theory (CCT) in clinical and nonclinical populations (see S2.1). We describe the design rationale before outlining the design stages in tutorial form. This allows us to show readers why the approach was needed and support them to consider and respond to the challenges that we encountered. We conclude that it is easier to consider norming and design practices in parallel when experimental units are defined linguistically. Corpus stimuli norming provides a versatile alternative when survey norming is prohibitive, especially in speech pathology.

规范临床人群语言刺激的教程
刺激规范(控制实验项目以减少偏差的过程)对心理语言学实验的有效性很重要。调查规范(要求大量的人评价或以其他方式定义项目)通常用于此目的,但需要大样本。临床人群并不总是很大,也不容易到达。临床参与者通常有持续的症状,一些队列经历语言和沟通困难。我们提出了一种语料库语言方法,适合临床人群的调查规范是困难的或不适当的。我们还包括生成的实验,该实验测量精神分裂症患者的隐喻创造行为,以在临床和非临床人群中测试认知约束理论(CCT)(见S2.1)。在以教程形式概述设计阶段之前,我们先描述设计原理。这使我们能够向读者展示为什么需要这种方法,并支持他们考虑和应对我们遇到的挑战。我们的结论是,当实验单元在语言上定义时,更容易并行考虑规范化和设计实践。语料库刺激规范提供了一个通用的替代调查规范是禁止的,特别是在言语病理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Corpus Linguistics
Applied Corpus Linguistics Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信