A Qualitative Research on Factors Affecting Academician Reputation

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Seda Şahintürk Şençimen, Kürşat Özdaşlı
{"title":"A Qualitative Research on Factors Affecting Academician Reputation","authors":"Seda Şahintürk Şençimen, Kürşat Özdaşlı","doi":"10.2399/yod.21.723853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to reveal the personal reputation perceptions of academic staff and the determinants of the concept of academic reputation, with the subgoals of determining what academics understand by the concept of academic reputation, determining the factors that affect their reputation, revealing the issues that cause damaging reputation among academics and determining positive and negative results. This study was conducted by applying the phenomenological design, which is one of the qualitative research designs. The participants were determined using the criterion sampling and snowball methods. The interview form was designed by the researcher in line with the purpose of the study, and the data were obtained through in-depth interviews with 20 faculty members working at Süleyman Demirel University. After the analysis of the audio recordings of the interviews, the data were coded using the interpretive phenomenology method based on the basic questions of the research. The Nvivo 12 Plus qualitative data analysis program was used to analyze the data. It was concluded that the academic staff earn a good reputation as long as they serve the mission of education-research and contribute to the society, but the administrators and management style of their institution also have a strong impact on their academic reputation. The personal, organizational and social determinants of academic reputation and the factors that damage or improve it were also identified. Finally, some suggestions were made on how to improve academic reputation.","PeriodicalId":42261,"journal":{"name":"Yuksekogretim Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuksekogretim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.723853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the personal reputation perceptions of academic staff and the determinants of the concept of academic reputation, with the subgoals of determining what academics understand by the concept of academic reputation, determining the factors that affect their reputation, revealing the issues that cause damaging reputation among academics and determining positive and negative results. This study was conducted by applying the phenomenological design, which is one of the qualitative research designs. The participants were determined using the criterion sampling and snowball methods. The interview form was designed by the researcher in line with the purpose of the study, and the data were obtained through in-depth interviews with 20 faculty members working at Süleyman Demirel University. After the analysis of the audio recordings of the interviews, the data were coded using the interpretive phenomenology method based on the basic questions of the research. The Nvivo 12 Plus qualitative data analysis program was used to analyze the data. It was concluded that the academic staff earn a good reputation as long as they serve the mission of education-research and contribute to the society, but the administrators and management style of their institution also have a strong impact on their academic reputation. The personal, organizational and social determinants of academic reputation and the factors that damage or improve it were also identified. Finally, some suggestions were made on how to improve academic reputation.
影响院士声誉因素的定性研究
本研究的目的是揭示学术人员的个人声誉认知和学术声誉概念的决定因素,其子目标是确定学术界对学术声誉概念所理解的内容,确定影响其声誉的因素,揭示造成学术声誉受损的问题,并确定积极和消极的结果。本研究采用了现象学设计,这是定性研究设计之一。参与者采用标准抽样和滚雪球法确定。访谈表是由研究人员根据研究目的设计的,数据是通过对苏莱曼德米雷尔大学20名教职员工的深入访谈获得的。在对访谈录音进行分析后,基于研究的基本问题,使用解释现象学方法对数据进行编码。使用Nvivo 12 Plus定性数据分析程序对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,只要学术人员服务于教育研究使命并为社会做出贡献,他们就会获得良好的声誉,但他们所在机构的管理人员和管理风格也会对他们的学术声誉产生强烈影响。还确定了学术声誉的个人、组织和社会决定因素以及损害或改善学术声誉的因素。最后,对如何提高学术声誉提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yuksekogretim Dergisi
Yuksekogretim Dergisi EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书