A Systematic Review of Research Evaluating the Use of Preference Assessment Methodology in the Workplace

IF 1.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Michael J. Simonian, Denys Brand, Makenna A Mason, M. Heinicke, Shannon M. Luoma
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Research Evaluating the Use of Preference Assessment Methodology in the Workplace","authors":"Michael J. Simonian, Denys Brand, Makenna A Mason, M. Heinicke, Shannon M. Luoma","doi":"10.1080/01608061.2020.1819933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Preference assessment methodology has largely been utilized to inform behavior-analytic treatment for clinical populations. However, the use of preference assessments has been extended to organizational settings when developing performance management interventions and identifying preferred stimuli and activities that may serve as potential reinforcers. Thus, the purpose of this review was to synthesize the existing research evaluating the use of preference assessment methodology in workplace settings. Twelve articles consisting of 13 studies were included in this review. We coded and summarized a number of key study features, including participant characteristics, stimuli used in preference assessments, cost of stimuli, method and frequency of preference assessments, the use of reinforcer assessments, and social validity measures. We also provide several suggestions for future research.","PeriodicalId":51667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","volume":"40 1","pages":"284 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01608061.2020.1819933","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2020.1819933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Preference assessment methodology has largely been utilized to inform behavior-analytic treatment for clinical populations. However, the use of preference assessments has been extended to organizational settings when developing performance management interventions and identifying preferred stimuli and activities that may serve as potential reinforcers. Thus, the purpose of this review was to synthesize the existing research evaluating the use of preference assessment methodology in workplace settings. Twelve articles consisting of 13 studies were included in this review. We coded and summarized a number of key study features, including participant characteristics, stimuli used in preference assessments, cost of stimuli, method and frequency of preference assessments, the use of reinforcer assessments, and social validity measures. We also provide several suggestions for future research.
评价偏好评估方法在工作场所使用的研究系统综述
偏好评估方法在很大程度上被用于临床人群的行为分析治疗。然而,在制定绩效管理干预措施和确定可能作为潜在强化因素的首选刺激和活动时,偏好评估的使用已扩展到组织设置。因此,本综述的目的是综合现有的评估偏好评估方法在工作场所设置中的使用的研究。本综述纳入了12篇文章,共13项研究。我们编码并总结了一些关键的研究特征,包括参与者特征、偏好评估中使用的刺激因素、刺激因素的成本、偏好评估的方法和频率、强化评估的使用以及社会效度测量。并对今后的研究提出了几点建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
47.60%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior Management—the official journal of the OBM Network (www.obmnetwork.com)—is a periodical devoted specifically to scientific principles to improve organizational performance through behavioral change. The journal publishes research and review articles, reports from the field, discussions, and book reviews on the topics that are critical to today"s organization development practitioners, operations managers, and human resource professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信