{"title":"Bricks as arguments","authors":"Sarah J. Constant","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20012.con","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study applies Leo Groarke’s (2019) ART approach and KC (Key Component) table\n method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam\n School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories\n or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The\n expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present\n promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as\n arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method\n capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20012.con","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This study applies Leo Groarke’s (2019) ART approach and KC (Key Component) table
method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam
School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories
or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The
expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present
promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as
arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method
capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.