{"title":"Bricks as arguments","authors":"Sarah J. Constant","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20012.con","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study applies Leo Groarke’s (2019) ART approach and KC (Key Component) table\n method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam\n School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories\n or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The\n expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present\n promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as\n arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method\n capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20012.con","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This study applies Leo Groarke’s (2019) ART approach and KC (Key Component) table
method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam
School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories
or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The
expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present
promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as
arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method
capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.