An Investigation of IEP Quality Associated With Special Education Placement for Students With Complex Support Needs

IF 3.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jennifer A. Kurth, Elissa Lockman Turner, Daria Gerasimova, Tyler A. Hicks, Alison L. Zagona, Kirsten R. Lansey, M. Mansouri, K. Lyon, Matt Jameson, Roxanne Loyless, Jesse R. Pace
{"title":"An Investigation of IEP Quality Associated With Special Education Placement for Students With Complex Support Needs","authors":"Jennifer A. Kurth, Elissa Lockman Turner, Daria Gerasimova, Tyler A. Hicks, Alison L. Zagona, Kirsten R. Lansey, M. Mansouri, K. Lyon, Matt Jameson, Roxanne Loyless, Jesse R. Pace","doi":"10.1177/15407969221134923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students with complex support needs require individualized education programs (IEPs) to describe their present levels of academic achievement and functional performance (PLAAFP), and the annual goals and supplementary aids and services (SAS) that will be provided to enable them to make progress in the least restrictive environment. Previous research has found that IEPs do not reflect recommended practices and that IEP quality varies by educational placement in inclusive and separate class settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a national sample of IEPs of elementary-aged students with complex support needs to determine whether placement predicts IEP quality. We used multilevel regression to measure the extent to which placement predicts overall IEP quality as well as the quality of IEP components, including PLAAFP, goals, and SAS. We did not detect statistically significant differences in IEP quality by placement for any of these IEP components or for overall quality; instead, we found the IEPs consistently failed to meet quality indicators across all four placement types. Given these findings, we suggest implications for future research aimed at improving IEP quality for students with complex support needs.","PeriodicalId":47213,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","volume":"47 1","pages":"244 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221134923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Students with complex support needs require individualized education programs (IEPs) to describe their present levels of academic achievement and functional performance (PLAAFP), and the annual goals and supplementary aids and services (SAS) that will be provided to enable them to make progress in the least restrictive environment. Previous research has found that IEPs do not reflect recommended practices and that IEP quality varies by educational placement in inclusive and separate class settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a national sample of IEPs of elementary-aged students with complex support needs to determine whether placement predicts IEP quality. We used multilevel regression to measure the extent to which placement predicts overall IEP quality as well as the quality of IEP components, including PLAAFP, goals, and SAS. We did not detect statistically significant differences in IEP quality by placement for any of these IEP components or for overall quality; instead, we found the IEPs consistently failed to meet quality indicators across all four placement types. Given these findings, we suggest implications for future research aimed at improving IEP quality for students with complex support needs.
复杂支持需求学生特殊教育安置相关的IEP质量调查
有复杂支持需求的学生需要个性化教育计划(IEPs)来描述他们目前的学业成就和功能表现水平(PLAAFP),以及将提供的年度目标和补充援助和服务(SAS),以使他们能够在限制最少的环境中取得进步。先前的研究发现,IEP并没有反映推荐的做法,IEP的质量也因班级设置的不同而不同。本研究的目的是评估具有复杂支持需求的小学年龄学生的IEP,以确定安置是否能预测IEP的质量。我们使用多水平回归来衡量安置对整体IEP质量的预测程度,以及IEP组成部分的质量,包括PLAAFP、目标和SAS。我们没有发现IEP质量因放置任何这些IEP组件或整体质量而有统计学显著差异;相反,我们发现iep始终未能满足所有四种安置类型的质量指标。鉴于这些发现,我们建议未来的研究旨在提高具有复杂支持需求的学生的IEP质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信