Effect of Voltage Dependent Load Model on Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generator in Large Scale Distribution System

Q4 Engineering
G. Manikanta, Ashish Mani, H. P. Singh, D. Chaturvedi
{"title":"Effect of Voltage Dependent Load Model on Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generator in Large Scale Distribution System","authors":"G. Manikanta, Ashish Mani, H. P. Singh, D. Chaturvedi","doi":"10.29252/MJEE.14.4.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distribution system supplies power to variety of load depending upon the consumer’s demand, which is increasing day by day and lead to high power losses and poor voltage regulation. The increase in demand can be met by integrating Distributed Generators (DG) into the distribution system. Optimal location and capacity of DG plays an important role in distribution network to minimize the power losses. Some researchers have studied this important optimization problem with constant power load which is independent of voltage. However, majority of consumers at load center uses voltage dependent load models, which are primarily dependent on magnitude of supply voltage. In practical distribution network, the assumption of constant power load can significantly affect the location and size of DG, which in turn can lead to higher power losses and poor voltage regulation. In this study, an investigation has been performed to find the increase in power loss due to the use of inappropriate load models, while solving the optimization problem. Furthermore, an attempt has been made in this study to reduce power losses occurring in large test bus systems with loads being dependent on voltage rather than the constant power load. Different test cases are created to analyse the power losses with appropriate load model and in-appropriate load model (constant power load model). The load at distribution network is not mainly dependent on any single type of load model, it is a combination of all load models.  In this study, a class of mix load viz., combination of residential, industrial, constant power, and commercial load, is also considered. In order to solve this critical combinatorial optimization problem with voltage dependent load model, which requires an extensive search, Adaptive Quantum inspired Evolutionary Algorithm (AQiEA) is used. The proposed algorithm uses entanglement and superposition principles, which does not require an operator to avoid premature convergence and tuning parameters for improving the convergence rate. A Quantum Rotation inspired Adaptive Crossover operator has been used as a variation operator for a better convergence. The effectiveness of AQiEA is demonstrated and computer simulations are carried out on two standard benchmark large test bus systems viz., 85 bus system and 118 bus system. In addition to AQiEA, four other algorithms (Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), and Ecogeography-based Optimization (EBO) with Classification based on Multiple Association Rules (CMAR)) have also been employed for comparison. Tabulated results show that the location and size of DGs determined using in-appropriate load model (constant power load model) has significantly high power losses when applied in distribution system with different load model (other voltage dependent load models) as compared with the location and size of DGs determined using the appropriate load model. Experimental results indicate that AQiEA has a better performance compared to other algorithms which are available in the literature.","PeriodicalId":37804,"journal":{"name":"Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":"97-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/MJEE.14.4.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Distribution system supplies power to variety of load depending upon the consumer’s demand, which is increasing day by day and lead to high power losses and poor voltage regulation. The increase in demand can be met by integrating Distributed Generators (DG) into the distribution system. Optimal location and capacity of DG plays an important role in distribution network to minimize the power losses. Some researchers have studied this important optimization problem with constant power load which is independent of voltage. However, majority of consumers at load center uses voltage dependent load models, which are primarily dependent on magnitude of supply voltage. In practical distribution network, the assumption of constant power load can significantly affect the location and size of DG, which in turn can lead to higher power losses and poor voltage regulation. In this study, an investigation has been performed to find the increase in power loss due to the use of inappropriate load models, while solving the optimization problem. Furthermore, an attempt has been made in this study to reduce power losses occurring in large test bus systems with loads being dependent on voltage rather than the constant power load. Different test cases are created to analyse the power losses with appropriate load model and in-appropriate load model (constant power load model). The load at distribution network is not mainly dependent on any single type of load model, it is a combination of all load models.  In this study, a class of mix load viz., combination of residential, industrial, constant power, and commercial load, is also considered. In order to solve this critical combinatorial optimization problem with voltage dependent load model, which requires an extensive search, Adaptive Quantum inspired Evolutionary Algorithm (AQiEA) is used. The proposed algorithm uses entanglement and superposition principles, which does not require an operator to avoid premature convergence and tuning parameters for improving the convergence rate. A Quantum Rotation inspired Adaptive Crossover operator has been used as a variation operator for a better convergence. The effectiveness of AQiEA is demonstrated and computer simulations are carried out on two standard benchmark large test bus systems viz., 85 bus system and 118 bus system. In addition to AQiEA, four other algorithms (Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), and Ecogeography-based Optimization (EBO) with Classification based on Multiple Association Rules (CMAR)) have also been employed for comparison. Tabulated results show that the location and size of DGs determined using in-appropriate load model (constant power load model) has significantly high power losses when applied in distribution system with different load model (other voltage dependent load models) as compared with the location and size of DGs determined using the appropriate load model. Experimental results indicate that AQiEA has a better performance compared to other algorithms which are available in the literature.
电压相关负荷模型对大型配电系统中分布式发电机布置和尺寸的影响
配电系统根据用户的用电需求,向各种负荷供电,这种负荷日益增加,导致电力损耗大,电压调节差。增加的需求可以通过将分布式发电机(DG)集成到配电系统中来满足。配电网中DG的位置和容量的优化对降低电网的损耗起着重要的作用。一些研究者研究了不受电压影响的恒负荷优化问题。然而,负荷中心的大多数消费者使用电压相关负荷模型,这主要取决于供电电压的大小。在实际配电网中,假设电力负荷恒定会显著影响DG的位置和规模,从而导致更高的功率损耗和较差的电压调节。本研究在解决优化问题的同时,调查了由于使用不合适的负荷模型而导致的功率损耗的增加。此外,本研究还尝试减少负载依赖于电压而不是恒定功率负载的大型测试母线系统中发生的功率损耗。创建不同的测试用例来分析适当负载模型和不适当负载模型(恒定功率负载模型)下的功率损耗。配电网的负荷不主要依赖于任何一种负荷模型,而是各种负荷模型的组合。本研究还考虑了一类混合负荷,即住宅、工业、恒功率和商业负荷的组合。为了解决这一需要大量搜索的电压相关负载模型组合优化问题,采用了自适应量子启发进化算法(AQiEA)。该算法利用了纠缠和叠加原理,不需要算子来避免过早收敛,并通过调整参数来提高收敛速度。为了更好地收敛,采用量子旋转启发的自适应交叉算子作为变分算子。验证了AQiEA的有效性,并在85总线和118总线两个标准基准大型测试总线系统上进行了计算机仿真。除了AQiEA算法外,还采用了遗传算法(GA)、粒子群算法(PSO)、引力搜索算法(GSA)、灰狼算法(GWO)和基于多关联规则分类的生态地理优化算法(EBO)进行了比较。表中结果表明,在不同负荷模型(其他电压相关负荷模型)的配电系统中,采用不合适负荷模型(恒功率负荷模型)确定的dg的位置和大小与采用合适负荷模型确定的dg的位置和大小相比,具有明显更高的功率损耗。实验结果表明,与文献中已有的算法相比,AQiEA具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering
Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The scope of Majlesi Journal of Electrcial Engineering (MJEE) is ranging from mathematical foundation to practical engineering design in all areas of electrical engineering. The editorial board is international and original unpublished papers are welcome from throughout the world. The journal is devoted primarily to research papers, but very high quality survey and tutorial papers are also published. There is no publication charge for the authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信