Philosophical Origins of Methodological Nomothetism of F. de Saussure’s Concept

Q2 Arts and Humanities
A. Luchyk, O. Prosianyk, Ivan Stepanchenko
{"title":"Philosophical Origins of Methodological Nomothetism of F. de Saussure’s Concept","authors":"A. Luchyk, O. Prosianyk, Ivan Stepanchenko","doi":"10.15388/respectus.2021.40.45.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article raises the problem of philosophical principles and origins of Ferdinand de Saussure’s views. The editors of “Course in General Linguistics”, C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, contributed to the emergence of stereotypes about Saussure as the founder of structuralism, who for the first time conceptually distinguished language and speech based on dichotomy, established the systemic nature of language as an abstract entity, developed a bilateral psychological theory of sign and divided linguistics into the synchronous and the diachronic. This prevented the synthesis of Saussure’s concept as a holistic and internally consistent anthropocentric system of views. The conceptual analysis of the fundamental theses of Saussure’s concept, given in Saussure’s autographed materials, which appeared in 2002, showed that its most important feature is that it was an anthropocentric nomothetic proposition aimed at creating the foundations for the study of human language activity as such, language as such and speech as such. The Kantian idea of anthropocentric transcendentalism can be considered the principal philosophical source of Saussure’s nomothetic project.","PeriodicalId":36933,"journal":{"name":"Respectus Philologicus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respectus Philologicus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/respectus.2021.40.45.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article raises the problem of philosophical principles and origins of Ferdinand de Saussure’s views. The editors of “Course in General Linguistics”, C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, contributed to the emergence of stereotypes about Saussure as the founder of structuralism, who for the first time conceptually distinguished language and speech based on dichotomy, established the systemic nature of language as an abstract entity, developed a bilateral psychological theory of sign and divided linguistics into the synchronous and the diachronic. This prevented the synthesis of Saussure’s concept as a holistic and internally consistent anthropocentric system of views. The conceptual analysis of the fundamental theses of Saussure’s concept, given in Saussure’s autographed materials, which appeared in 2002, showed that its most important feature is that it was an anthropocentric nomothetic proposition aimed at creating the foundations for the study of human language activity as such, language as such and speech as such. The Kantian idea of anthropocentric transcendentalism can be considered the principal philosophical source of Saussure’s nomothetic project.
索绪尔概念方法论无神论的哲学渊源
本文提出了索绪尔观点的哲学原理和起源问题。《普通语言学课程》的编辑C. Bally和a . Sechehaye促成了索绪尔作为结构主义创始人的刻板印象的出现,索绪尔第一次在概念上区分了基于二分法的语言和言语,建立了语言作为抽象实体的系统本质,发展了符号的双边心理学理论,并将语言学分为同步和历时。这阻止了索绪尔的概念作为一个整体的和内部一致的人类中心主义的观点系统的综合。2002年出版的索绪尔《索绪尔签名材料》对索绪尔概念的基本论点进行了概念分析,结果表明,索绪尔概念的最重要特征是它是一个以人类为中心的本体命题,旨在为研究人类语言活动本身、语言本身和言语本身奠定基础。康德的人类中心主义的先验主义思想可以被认为是索绪尔本体计划的主要哲学来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respectus Philologicus
Respectus Philologicus Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信