Mashlaha in Financing Risk Measurement in Sharia Financing Institutions

Salmah Said, A. Sofyan, A. Amiruddin
{"title":"Mashlaha in Financing Risk Measurement in Sharia Financing Institutions","authors":"Salmah Said, A. Sofyan, A. Amiruddin","doi":"10.21043/iqtishadia.v12i2.4992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><em>The crisis of confidence in the credit rating agency forced Islamic financing institutions to apply risk measurement methods independently and renewed the study of credit risk measurement. Moreover, this research also discusses mashlaha (public interest) in measuring financing risk. This research </em><em>use</em><em>s a mixed method</em><em> approach, </em><em>combining quantitative methods to measure risk by utilizing CreditRisk+</em><em>,</em><em> and qualitative </em><em>methods</em><em> in analyzing mashlaha </em><em>i</em><em>n these measurements. This study revealed that CreditRisk+</em> <em>is able to measure financing risk accurately.</em><em> This study also found that there is mashlaha as part of </em><em>maqashid al-sharia</em><em> in risk measur</em><em>e</em><em>ment</em><em>, namely 1) Tahdzib al-Fard, that mak</em><em>es</em><em> a financial institution capable of independently measuring the risk of its own financing; 2) Iqamah al-Adl, independent measurement will create information justice by comparing measurement results both internally and externally. 3) Mashlaha itself, with internal risk measurement</em><em>,</em><em> will reduce systemic risk. </em><em>The i</em><em>mplications of this study is </em><em>the use of mashlaha in analyzing financing risk provides more stringent prudential in the measurement of financing risk</em><em>.</em></p>","PeriodicalId":55756,"journal":{"name":"Iqtishadia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iqtishadia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v12i2.4992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The crisis of confidence in the credit rating agency forced Islamic financing institutions to apply risk measurement methods independently and renewed the study of credit risk measurement. Moreover, this research also discusses mashlaha (public interest) in measuring financing risk. This research uses a mixed method approach, combining quantitative methods to measure risk by utilizing CreditRisk+, and qualitative methods in analyzing mashlaha in these measurements. This study revealed that CreditRisk+ is able to measure financing risk accurately. This study also found that there is mashlaha as part of maqashid al-sharia in risk measurement, namely 1) Tahdzib al-Fard, that makes a financial institution capable of independently measuring the risk of its own financing; 2) Iqamah al-Adl, independent measurement will create information justice by comparing measurement results both internally and externally. 3) Mashlaha itself, with internal risk measurement, will reduce systemic risk. The implications of this study is the use of mashlaha in analyzing financing risk provides more stringent prudential in the measurement of financing risk.

Sharia金融机构融资风险度量中的Mashlaha
对信用评级机构的信心危机迫使伊斯兰金融机构独立应用风险计量方法,并重新启动了对信用风险计量的研究。此外,本研究还探讨了公共利益在衡量融资风险中的作用。本研究采用混合方法,结合定量方法利用CreditRisk+测量风险,并结合定性方法分析这些测量中的mashlaha。这项研究表明,CreditRisk+能够准确地衡量融资风险。这项研究还发现,在风险衡量中,mashlaha是伊斯兰教法的一部分,即1)Tahdzib al-Fard,它使金融机构能够独立衡量自己融资的风险;2) Iqamah al-Adl,独立测量将通过比较内部和外部的测量结果来创造信息正义。3) Mashlaha本身,通过内部风险衡量,将降低系统性风险。本研究的启示是,使用mashlaha分析融资风险为衡量融资风险提供了更严格的审慎性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信