Adding organic matter to restore wetland soils may increase methane generation and is not needed for hydric soil development

Brian Scott, A. Baldwin, S. Yarwood
{"title":"Adding organic matter to restore wetland soils may increase methane generation and is not needed for hydric soil development","authors":"Brian Scott, A. Baldwin, S. Yarwood","doi":"10.5194/bg-2021-182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Methane (CH4) emissions are a potent contributor to global warming and wetlands can be a significant CH4 source. In a microcosm study we evaluated how the practice of amending soils with organic matter as part of wetland restoration projects may affect CH4 production potential. Organic amendments including hay, manure, biosolids and compost were evaluated at three different levels. Using 1-liter glass microcosms, we measured the production of biogenic gases over 60 days in two soils, a sandy loam (SL) and a sandy clay loam (SCL). Fresh organic amendments increased CH4 production, leading to potentially higher global warming potential and wetland C loss, particularly in sandy soils. Organic amendments increased biogenic gas production in two sequential steady state phases: Phase 1 produced some CH4 but was mostly carbon dioxide (CO2) followed by Phase 2, two to six weeks later, with much higher total gas and nearly equal amounts of CH4 and CO2. The CH4 from the SCL soil ranged from 0.003–0.8 cc/Kg/day in Phase 1 to 0.75–28 in Phase 2 and the SL range from 0.03–16 cc/Kg/day in Phase 1 to 1.8–64 in Phase 2. We had set out to identify an organic amendment that would promote iron (Fe) reduction without excess CH4, but amendments were not needed to produce Fe and make soils hydric. Adding fresh organic matter (hay) resulted in both excess Fe2+ and CH4 whereas composted amendments had little effect. The potential for excess methanogenesis should be taken into account when considering organic matter amendments in mitigation wetlands.\n","PeriodicalId":89897,"journal":{"name":"Biogeosciences discussions : (BGD)","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeosciences discussions : (BGD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Methane (CH4) emissions are a potent contributor to global warming and wetlands can be a significant CH4 source. In a microcosm study we evaluated how the practice of amending soils with organic matter as part of wetland restoration projects may affect CH4 production potential. Organic amendments including hay, manure, biosolids and compost were evaluated at three different levels. Using 1-liter glass microcosms, we measured the production of biogenic gases over 60 days in two soils, a sandy loam (SL) and a sandy clay loam (SCL). Fresh organic amendments increased CH4 production, leading to potentially higher global warming potential and wetland C loss, particularly in sandy soils. Organic amendments increased biogenic gas production in two sequential steady state phases: Phase 1 produced some CH4 but was mostly carbon dioxide (CO2) followed by Phase 2, two to six weeks later, with much higher total gas and nearly equal amounts of CH4 and CO2. The CH4 from the SCL soil ranged from 0.003–0.8 cc/Kg/day in Phase 1 to 0.75–28 in Phase 2 and the SL range from 0.03–16 cc/Kg/day in Phase 1 to 1.8–64 in Phase 2. We had set out to identify an organic amendment that would promote iron (Fe) reduction without excess CH4, but amendments were not needed to produce Fe and make soils hydric. Adding fresh organic matter (hay) resulted in both excess Fe2+ and CH4 whereas composted amendments had little effect. The potential for excess methanogenesis should be taken into account when considering organic matter amendments in mitigation wetlands.
添加有机物来恢复湿地土壤可能会增加甲烷的产生,而不是水化土壤发展所需要的
摘要甲烷(CH4)排放是导致全球变暖的一个重要因素,而湿地可能是一个重要的CH4源。在一项微观研究中,我们评估了作为湿地恢复项目一部分的有机物修复土壤的做法如何影响CH4生产潜力。有机改良剂包括干草、粪肥、生物固体和堆肥,在三个不同的水平上进行了评估。利用1升玻璃显微镜,我们测量了两种土壤(砂壤土(SL)和砂质粘土壤土(SCL)) 60天内生物气体的产生。新鲜的有机修正增加了CH4的产生,导致潜在的更高的全球变暖潜势和湿地碳损失,特别是在沙质土壤中。在两个连续的稳定状态阶段,有机修正增加了生物气产量:第一阶段产生了一些CH4,但主要是二氧化碳(CO2),第二阶段,两到六周后,气体总量高得多,CH4和CO2的量几乎相等。第一期土壤CH4含量为0.003 ~ 0.8 cc/Kg/d至0.75 ~ 28 cc/Kg/d,第一期土壤CH4含量为0.03 ~ 16 cc/Kg/d至1.8 ~ 64 cc/Kg/d。我们已经开始寻找一种有机改剂,可以在不过量CH4的情况下促进铁(Fe)的还原,但不需要改剂来产生铁并使土壤水化。添加新鲜有机质(干草)导致Fe2+和CH4均过量,而堆肥改进剂对Fe2+和CH4的影响不大。在考虑缓解湿地的有机质修正时,应考虑到过量产甲烷的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书