Mental health of the adult population in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid Review.

Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2022-02-03 eCollection Date: 2021-11-01 DOI:10.25646/9537
Elvira Mauz, Sophie Eicher, Diana Peitz, Stephan Junker, Heike Hölling, Julia Thom
{"title":"Mental health of the adult population in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid Review.","authors":"Elvira Mauz, Sophie Eicher, Diana Peitz, Stephan Junker, Heike Hölling, Julia Thom","doi":"10.25646/9537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This rapid review examines how the mental health of adults in the general population in Germany changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a systematic literature search and included 68 publications as of July 30 2021. The underlying studies were classified according to their suitability for representative statements for the general population and for estimating changes in mental health over time. In addition, the observation period and operationalisation of outcomes were considered. The first wave of infection and the summer plateau were mapped by 65% of the studies. Studies that were particularly suitable for representative statements due to their research design showed mixed results, which tend to indicate a largely resilient adult population with a proportion of vulnerable individuals. A predominantly negative development of mental health was described by results from more bias-prone study designs. Routine data analyses showed decreases in outpatient and especially inpatient care, increased use of a crisis service, mixed results for outpatient diagnoses, incapacity to work and mortality as well as indications of shifts in the spectrum of diagnoses. As the current evidence is ambiguous, generalised statements should be reflected in favour of a differentiated view. There is a need for research on the further course of the pandemic, specific risk groups and the prevalence of mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25646/9537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This rapid review examines how the mental health of adults in the general population in Germany changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a systematic literature search and included 68 publications as of July 30 2021. The underlying studies were classified according to their suitability for representative statements for the general population and for estimating changes in mental health over time. In addition, the observation period and operationalisation of outcomes were considered. The first wave of infection and the summer plateau were mapped by 65% of the studies. Studies that were particularly suitable for representative statements due to their research design showed mixed results, which tend to indicate a largely resilient adult population with a proportion of vulnerable individuals. A predominantly negative development of mental health was described by results from more bias-prone study designs. Routine data analyses showed decreases in outpatient and especially inpatient care, increased use of a crisis service, mixed results for outpatient diagnoses, incapacity to work and mortality as well as indications of shifts in the spectrum of diagnoses. As the current evidence is ambiguous, generalised statements should be reflected in favour of a differentiated view. There is a need for research on the further course of the pandemic, specific risk groups and the prevalence of mental disorders.

新冠肺炎大流行期间德国成年人口的心理健康。快速审查
这篇快速综述研究了德国普通人群中成年人的心理健康在新冠肺炎大流行期间是如何变化的。截至2021年7月30日,我们进行了系统的文献检索,收录了68篇出版物。基础研究根据其对普通人群代表性陈述的适用性和对心理健康随时间变化的估计进行了分类。此外,还考虑了观察期和结果的可操作性。65%的研究绘制了第一波感染和夏季高原的地图。由于其研究设计,特别适合作为代表性陈述的研究显示出喜忧参半的结果,这往往表明成年人口在很大程度上具有韧性,其中也有一定比例的弱势群体。更倾向于偏见的研究设计的结果描述了心理健康的主要负面发展。常规数据分析显示,门诊,尤其是住院护理减少,危机服务的使用增加,门诊诊断结果喜忧参半,丧失工作能力和死亡率,以及诊断范围发生变化的迹象。由于目前的证据不明确,应反映笼统的陈述,以支持有区别的观点。有必要对新冠疫情的进一步发展过程、特定风险群体和精神障碍的流行率进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信