Effect of lactic acid bacteria administered as feed supplement on the weight gain and ruminal pH in two South African goat breeds

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Takalani Whitney Maake, M. Adeleke, O. Aiyegoro
{"title":"Effect of lactic acid bacteria administered as feed supplement on the weight gain and ruminal pH in two South African goat breeds","authors":"Takalani Whitney Maake, M. Adeleke, O. Aiyegoro","doi":"10.1080/0035919X.2020.1870018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibiotics as growth promoters are banned in most European countries, because of antibiotic resistance and residues in animal products, and the release of recalcitrant antibiotics into the environment. Probiotics are the preferred alternative, because of no harmful attributes when compared to antibiotics, and the additional advantage of the ability to stabilise the microbial communities in the gut. We investigated the effects of LAB on the growth performance of South African goats. Randomly selected 17 Specked and 18 Boer goats were divided into five treatment groups according to sex and breed and were placed in an experimental trial for 30 days. Ruminal fluid was collected before and after the trial to monitor the changes in the pH. Data collected were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SAS, version 9.4). Results revealed that LAB supplementation had no effect on feed intake in all experimental groups. However, the average weight gain was higher in the LAB groups when compared to other groups. Sex and breed had effects on final body weight; that is male (18.4 kg) goats are heavier than females (15.3 kg) averagely, irrespective of the breed, and the Boer goats are heavier than Specked irrespective of gender. The pH decreased averagely from 7.01 to 6.33 across all treatments, confirming the modulatory effect of the administered lactic acid bacteria. The findings in this study suggested that LAB as probiotics may induce beneficial effects in goats by enhancing weight gain, dropping the gut pH, thus maintaining an equilibrium of ruminal microbiota.","PeriodicalId":23255,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa","volume":"76 1","pages":"35 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0035919X.2020.1870018","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0035919X.2020.1870018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Antibiotics as growth promoters are banned in most European countries, because of antibiotic resistance and residues in animal products, and the release of recalcitrant antibiotics into the environment. Probiotics are the preferred alternative, because of no harmful attributes when compared to antibiotics, and the additional advantage of the ability to stabilise the microbial communities in the gut. We investigated the effects of LAB on the growth performance of South African goats. Randomly selected 17 Specked and 18 Boer goats were divided into five treatment groups according to sex and breed and were placed in an experimental trial for 30 days. Ruminal fluid was collected before and after the trial to monitor the changes in the pH. Data collected were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SAS, version 9.4). Results revealed that LAB supplementation had no effect on feed intake in all experimental groups. However, the average weight gain was higher in the LAB groups when compared to other groups. Sex and breed had effects on final body weight; that is male (18.4 kg) goats are heavier than females (15.3 kg) averagely, irrespective of the breed, and the Boer goats are heavier than Specked irrespective of gender. The pH decreased averagely from 7.01 to 6.33 across all treatments, confirming the modulatory effect of the administered lactic acid bacteria. The findings in this study suggested that LAB as probiotics may induce beneficial effects in goats by enhancing weight gain, dropping the gut pH, thus maintaining an equilibrium of ruminal microbiota.
乳酸菌对两个南非山羊品种增重和瘤胃pH值的影响
在大多数欧洲国家,作为生长促进剂的抗生素被禁止使用,因为动物产品中存在抗生素耐药性和残留物,以及顽固的抗生素会释放到环境中。益生菌是首选的替代品,因为与抗生素相比,益生菌没有有害的特性,并且具有稳定肠道微生物群落的额外优势。我们研究了LAB对南非山羊生长性能的影响。随机选择17只斑点山羊和18只波尔山羊,根据性别和品种分为5个处理组,并进行为期30天的实验试验。试验前后收集瘤胃液,以监测pH值的变化。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)(SAS,9.4版)对收集的数据进行分析。结果显示,在所有实验组中,添加LAB对采食量没有影响。然而,与其他组相比,LAB组的平均体重增加更高。性别和品种对最终体重有影响;那是男性(18.4 公斤)山羊比雌性重(15.3 kg),并且无论性别,波尔山羊都比Specked重。在所有处理中,pH值平均从7.01降至6.33,证实了施用乳酸菌的调节作用。这项研究的结果表明,LAB作为益生菌可以通过增加体重、降低肠道pH值,从而保持瘤胃微生物群的平衡,从而对山羊产生有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa
Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa , published on behalf of the Royal Society of South Africa since 1908, comprises a rich archive of original scientific research in and beyond South Africa. Since 1878, when it was founded as Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society, the Journal’s strength has lain in its multi- and inter-disciplinary orientation, which is aimed at ‘promoting the improvement and diffusion of science in all its branches’ (original Charter). Today this includes natural, physical, medical, environmental and earth sciences as well as any other topic that may be of interest or importance to the people of Africa. Transactions publishes original research papers, review articles, special issues, feature articles, festschriften and book reviews. While coverage emphasizes southern Africa, submissions concerning the rest of the continent are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信