The “inner man” – Fundamental Concept of Pauline Anthropology?

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
Stephan Hecht
{"title":"The “inner man” – Fundamental Concept of Pauline Anthropology?","authors":"Stephan Hecht","doi":"10.31743/biban.13474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reader of the Pauline Epistles encounters the metaphor of the “inner man” for the first time in 2 Cor 4:16. Inconspicuous at first glance, this metaphor reveals not only a wide reception history within Christian thought and tradition but also a conceptual depth which brings us close to the origins of our thought on human personality and subjectivity. In this article, I want thus to elaborate on the concept of the “inner man” in Paul. Tracing its origins in Plato, I want to show how this metaphor must be understood on a conceptual level using metaphors as archaeological tools that help to discover concepts that might get lost when only interpreted as linguistic ornaments. Claiming that Plato explicitly expresses the human »self« as a continuous agent in front of changing phenomena of the human soul with his concept of the “inner man,” I will then turn to Paul. Even though it is impossible to trace the exact origins of this metaphor in the writings of the Apostle, it is my thesis that it can be found in 2 Cor 4:16 in substance. Paul thus uses the metaphor of the “inner man” to express the newly redeemed and yet justified Christian »self« that is confronted with opposition and contradiction that waste away the outer man. The exact Greek wording of this metaphor allows to identify the pictorial level of this metaphor in Paul with the temple in Jerusalem. As I will show, Paul thus integrates two anthropological lines that he derives from the creational accounts in the “inner man,” showing interesting parallels to Philo of Alexandria. With the metaphor of the “inner man,” the reader of 2 Cor 4:16 therefore encounters a or even the fundamental concept of Pauline Anthropology.\n ","PeriodicalId":52162,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Annals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.13474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reader of the Pauline Epistles encounters the metaphor of the “inner man” for the first time in 2 Cor 4:16. Inconspicuous at first glance, this metaphor reveals not only a wide reception history within Christian thought and tradition but also a conceptual depth which brings us close to the origins of our thought on human personality and subjectivity. In this article, I want thus to elaborate on the concept of the “inner man” in Paul. Tracing its origins in Plato, I want to show how this metaphor must be understood on a conceptual level using metaphors as archaeological tools that help to discover concepts that might get lost when only interpreted as linguistic ornaments. Claiming that Plato explicitly expresses the human »self« as a continuous agent in front of changing phenomena of the human soul with his concept of the “inner man,” I will then turn to Paul. Even though it is impossible to trace the exact origins of this metaphor in the writings of the Apostle, it is my thesis that it can be found in 2 Cor 4:16 in substance. Paul thus uses the metaphor of the “inner man” to express the newly redeemed and yet justified Christian »self« that is confronted with opposition and contradiction that waste away the outer man. The exact Greek wording of this metaphor allows to identify the pictorial level of this metaphor in Paul with the temple in Jerusalem. As I will show, Paul thus integrates two anthropological lines that he derives from the creational accounts in the “inner man,” showing interesting parallels to Philo of Alexandria. With the metaphor of the “inner man,” the reader of 2 Cor 4:16 therefore encounters a or even the fundamental concept of Pauline Anthropology.  
“内在的人”——波林人类学的基本概念?
波林书信集的读者在哥林多后书4:16中第一次遇到了“内在人”的隐喻。乍一看,这个隐喻并不引人注目,它不仅揭示了基督教思想和传统中广泛的接受历史,而且还揭示了一种概念深度,使我们接近了我们关于人的个性和主体性的思想的起源。在这篇文章中,我想以此来阐述保罗的“内在人”的概念。追溯其起源于柏拉图,我想展示如何在概念层面上理解这一隐喻,将隐喻作为考古工具,帮助发现当仅被解释为语言装饰时可能会丢失的概念。声称柏拉图用他的“内在人”概念明确地将人的“自我”表达为人类灵魂变化现象面前的连续代理人,我将转向保罗。尽管在使徒的著作中不可能追溯到这个隐喻的确切起源,但我的论点是,它可以在《哥林多后书》4:16中找到实质内容。因此,保罗用“内在的人”的隐喻来表达新救赎的、但被证明是正当的基督徒“自我”,他们面临着浪费外在人的对立和矛盾。这个隐喻的确切希腊语措辞允许将这个隐喻在保罗身上的形象层面与耶路撒冷的圣殿相识别。正如我将要展示的那样,保罗因此整合了他从“内在人”中的创造论描述中得出的两条人类学路线,与亚历山大的菲洛有着有趣的相似之处。因此,《哥林多后书》4:16的读者在隐喻“内在的人”时,遇到了一个甚至是波林人类学的基本概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biblical Annals
Biblical Annals Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书