The Social Effects of Entrepreneurship on Society and Some Potential Remedies: Four Provocations

IF 4.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Tim Weiss, Robert N. Eberhart, M. Lounsbury, Andrew J. Nelson, V. Rindova, John W. Meyer, Patricia Bromley, Rachel Atkins, Trish Ruebottom, Jennifer E. Jennings, Dev Jennings, Madeline Toubiana, Angelique Slade Shantz, Niki Khorasani, Daniel Wadhwani, Hannah-Rose Tucker, D. Kirsch, Brent D. Goldfarb, H. Aldrich, Daniel P. Aldrich
{"title":"The Social Effects of Entrepreneurship on Society and Some Potential Remedies: Four Provocations","authors":"Tim Weiss, Robert N. Eberhart, M. Lounsbury, Andrew J. Nelson, V. Rindova, John W. Meyer, Patricia Bromley, Rachel Atkins, Trish Ruebottom, Jennifer E. Jennings, Dev Jennings, Madeline Toubiana, Angelique Slade Shantz, Niki Khorasani, Daniel Wadhwani, Hannah-Rose Tucker, D. Kirsch, Brent D. Goldfarb, H. Aldrich, Daniel P. Aldrich","doi":"10.1177/10564926231181555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A rapidly growing research stream examines the social effects of entrepreneurship on society. This research assesses the rise of entrepreneurship as a dominant theme in society and studies how entrepreneurship contributes to the production and acceptance of socio-economic inequality regimes, social problems, class and power struggles, and systemic inequities. In this article, scholars present new perspectives on an organizational sociology-inspired research agenda of entrepreneurial capitalism and detail the potential remedies to bound the unfettered expansion of a narrow conception of entrepreneurship. Taken together, the essays put forward four central provocations: 1) reform the study and pedagogy of entrepreneurship by bringing in the humanities; 2) examine entrepreneurship as a cultural phenomenon shaping society; 3) go beyond the dominant biases in entrepreneurship research and pedagogy; and 4) explore alternative models to entrepreneurial capitalism. More scholarly work scrutinizing the entrepreneurship–society nexus is urgently needed, and these essays provide generative arguments toward further developing this research agenda.","PeriodicalId":47877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Inquiry","volume":"32 1","pages":"251 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926231181555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A rapidly growing research stream examines the social effects of entrepreneurship on society. This research assesses the rise of entrepreneurship as a dominant theme in society and studies how entrepreneurship contributes to the production and acceptance of socio-economic inequality regimes, social problems, class and power struggles, and systemic inequities. In this article, scholars present new perspectives on an organizational sociology-inspired research agenda of entrepreneurial capitalism and detail the potential remedies to bound the unfettered expansion of a narrow conception of entrepreneurship. Taken together, the essays put forward four central provocations: 1) reform the study and pedagogy of entrepreneurship by bringing in the humanities; 2) examine entrepreneurship as a cultural phenomenon shaping society; 3) go beyond the dominant biases in entrepreneurship research and pedagogy; and 4) explore alternative models to entrepreneurial capitalism. More scholarly work scrutinizing the entrepreneurship–society nexus is urgently needed, and these essays provide generative arguments toward further developing this research agenda.
企业家精神对社会的社会影响及其可能的补救措施:四种挑衅
一个快速增长的研究流检验了企业家精神对社会的社会影响。本研究评估了企业家精神作为社会主导主题的兴起,并研究了企业家精神如何促进社会经济不平等制度、社会问题、阶级和权力斗争以及系统性不平等的产生和接受。在这篇文章中,学者们对创业资本主义的组织社会学启发的研究议程提出了新的观点,并详细介绍了潜在的补救措施,以限制狭隘的创业概念的不受约束的扩张。综上所述,本文提出了四个核心问题:1)引入人文学科,改革创业学的研究和教学;2)将创业视为一种塑造社会的文化现象;3)超越创业研究和教学中的主流偏见;4)探索创业资本主义的替代模式。我们迫切需要更多的学术工作来审视企业家精神与社会之间的联系,而这些论文为进一步发展这一研究议程提供了创造性的论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Inquiry, sponsored by the Western Academy of Management, is a refereed journal for scholars and professionals in management, organizational behavior, strategy, and human resources. Its intent is to explore ideas and build knowledge in management theory and practice, with a focus on creative, nontraditional research as well as key controversies in the field. The journal seeks to maintain a constructive balance between innovation and quality, and at the same time widely define the forms that relevant contributions to the field can take. JMI features six sections: Meet the Person, Provocations, Reflections on Experience, Nontraditional Research, Essays, and Dialog.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信