How Are They Elected? Vote Buying And General Election In Ogan Ilir District, South Sumatera Province

Aristo Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.24269/ars.v6i2.1029
Mery Yanti, A. Alamsyah
{"title":"How Are They Elected? Vote Buying And General Election In Ogan Ilir District, South Sumatera Province","authors":"Mery Yanti, A. Alamsyah","doi":"10.24269/ars.v6i2.1029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article designed to examine patronage practice in the 2014 general election in Ogan Ilir district, South Sumatera Province, Indonesia, before and after election in one electoral area (Ogan Ilir 1). We apply Nine Step to Victory (Alamsyah, 2015) framework to achieve this goal. Our key informants are some legislative candidates and their brokerage or winning team at various level. Primary data gathered through depth interview and secondary data collected from the government institution. This data will be analyzed using interactive model (Miles, Huberman, and Saldana, 1994). Drawing on the qualitative approach, we find that, before election day, all candidates in this area practicing vote buying and patronage to get political support from the voters. A form of patronage dominated by club goods, and cash transfer (transport allowance, communication and consumption cost, and vote buying). We do not find incumbency candidate who is practicing fork barrel. After election day, especially when the winner candidates, has been working as a legislator, he has an obligation to continuing patronage through informal and cultural networking (personal or community event). In this various event, he must deliver goods, services, or money to the people (as an individual or group). Our results are strengthening the previous finding that all candidates have begun implementing patronage strategy when they are recruiting the winning team, campaign, and realize vote buying. Family, especially extended family, and friendship is the primary foundation for all candidates to build brokerage (the winning team) structure. All candidates also using “by name by address” strategy to guide vote-buying practice. We discuss this finding, showing limitation and agenda for the research on this topic.","PeriodicalId":31637,"journal":{"name":"Aristo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aristo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v6i2.1029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article designed to examine patronage practice in the 2014 general election in Ogan Ilir district, South Sumatera Province, Indonesia, before and after election in one electoral area (Ogan Ilir 1). We apply Nine Step to Victory (Alamsyah, 2015) framework to achieve this goal. Our key informants are some legislative candidates and their brokerage or winning team at various level. Primary data gathered through depth interview and secondary data collected from the government institution. This data will be analyzed using interactive model (Miles, Huberman, and Saldana, 1994). Drawing on the qualitative approach, we find that, before election day, all candidates in this area practicing vote buying and patronage to get political support from the voters. A form of patronage dominated by club goods, and cash transfer (transport allowance, communication and consumption cost, and vote buying). We do not find incumbency candidate who is practicing fork barrel. After election day, especially when the winner candidates, has been working as a legislator, he has an obligation to continuing patronage through informal and cultural networking (personal or community event). In this various event, he must deliver goods, services, or money to the people (as an individual or group). Our results are strengthening the previous finding that all candidates have begun implementing patronage strategy when they are recruiting the winning team, campaign, and realize vote buying. Family, especially extended family, and friendship is the primary foundation for all candidates to build brokerage (the winning team) structure. All candidates also using “by name by address” strategy to guide vote-buying practice. We discuss this finding, showing limitation and agenda for the research on this topic.
他们是如何当选的?南苏门答腊省奥干伊里尔地区的贿选和大选
本文旨在考察2014年印度尼西亚南苏门答腊省奥甘伊利尔区大选中一个选区(奥甘伊利尔1)选举前后的赞助做法。我们采用“九步走向胜利”(Alamsyah,2015)框架来实现这一目标。我们的主要线人是一些立法候选人及其经纪公司或不同级别的获胜团队。通过深度访谈收集的主要数据和从政府机构收集的次要数据。这些数据将使用交互模型进行分析(Miles、Huberman和Saldana,1994)。根据定性方法,我们发现,在选举日之前,该地区的所有候选人都在进行贿选和赞助,以获得选民的政治支持。一种以俱乐部商品和现金转移(交通津贴、沟通和消费成本以及购买选票)为主的赞助形式。我们找不到正在练习叉桶的现任候选人。选举日后,特别是当获胜者候选人一直担任立法者时,他有义务通过非正式和文化网络(个人或社区活动)继续赞助。在这种不同的活动中,他必须向人们(作为个人或团体)提供商品、服务或金钱。我们的结果强化了之前的发现,即所有候选人在招募获胜团队、竞选和实现选票购买时都已开始实施赞助策略。家庭,尤其是大家庭和友谊是所有候选人建立经纪(获胜团队)结构的首要基础。所有候选人还使用“按姓名按地址”策略来指导选票购买实践。我们对这一发现进行了讨论,指出了这一主题研究的局限性和议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书