Rhetorics of Becoming: Between Metamorphosis and Metaphor

IF 0.8 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
S. Frampton
{"title":"Rhetorics of Becoming: Between Metamorphosis and Metaphor","authors":"S. Frampton","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2022.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In a series of essays, Paul Ricœur and Jacques Derrida described the work of metaphor as a cognitive operation requiring readers to apprehend simultaneously the continuity and difference of tenor and vehicle: Juliet is and is not the sun; a book is and is not a chariot. In this paper, I show how the cognitive features required of a reader in thinking through metaphor are the same as those necessary to imagine literary metamorphosis, a trope that can be understood as the actualization of metaphor within the diegetic frame, that is, as a metaphor that is no longer figurative, but descriptive. Drawing on the work of W. T. Mitchell, this paper explores the relationship between these two literary figures as imaginative processes. In it, I propose that the phenomenological model of metaphor developed by Ricœur and Derrida be redeployed as a much-need critical apparatus with which to account for the cognitive work required in conceiving of metamorphosis in creative literature, focusing on key examples from Ovid, Dante, Shakespeare, and Rushdie.","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":"53 1","pages":"183 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2022.0008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:In a series of essays, Paul Ricœur and Jacques Derrida described the work of metaphor as a cognitive operation requiring readers to apprehend simultaneously the continuity and difference of tenor and vehicle: Juliet is and is not the sun; a book is and is not a chariot. In this paper, I show how the cognitive features required of a reader in thinking through metaphor are the same as those necessary to imagine literary metamorphosis, a trope that can be understood as the actualization of metaphor within the diegetic frame, that is, as a metaphor that is no longer figurative, but descriptive. Drawing on the work of W. T. Mitchell, this paper explores the relationship between these two literary figures as imaginative processes. In it, I propose that the phenomenological model of metaphor developed by Ricœur and Derrida be redeployed as a much-need critical apparatus with which to account for the cognitive work required in conceiving of metamorphosis in creative literature, focusing on key examples from Ovid, Dante, Shakespeare, and Rushdie.
成为修辞:在变形与隐喻之间
摘要:保罗Ricœur和德里达在一系列文章中将隐喻的工作描述为一种认知操作,要求读者同时理解男声和载体的连续性和差异:朱丽叶是太阳又不是太阳;书是战车,但又不是战车。在本文中,我展示了读者通过隐喻思考所需要的认知特征与想象文学变形所需要的认知特征是相同的,文学变形可以被理解为隐喻在叙事框架内的实现,也就是说,作为一种不再是比喻的隐喻,而是描述性的隐喻。本文以米切尔的作品为基础,探讨了这两个文学人物在想象过程中的关系。在这篇文章中,我建议将Ricœur和德里达发展的隐喻现象学模型重新定位为一种急需的批判工具,用它来解释在创作文学中构思变形所需要的认知工作,重点关注奥维德、但丁、莎士比亚和拉什迪的关键例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Literary History
New Literary History LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信