{"title":"Introduction to December 2021 special issue of the Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha: The Wisdom of Solomon","authors":"J. Zurawski, K. Hogan","doi":"10.1177/09518207211058998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following is the second special issue of the Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha (JSP) devoted to studies of the Wisdom of Solomon, edited by Karina Martin Hogan and Jason Zurawski. The collection of papers largely derives from three sessions of the Wisdom and Apocalypticism program unit of the Society of Biblical Literature focused on the important first-century text: “The Wisdom of Solomon at the Crossroads of Wisdom, Apocalypticism, and Philosophy” (2018, Denver); “Knowledge and the Cosmos in the Wisdom of Solomon” (2019, San Diego); and “The Wisdom of Solomon” (2020, online). The first four articles, by Emma Wasserman, Benjamin Wold, Bradley Gregory, and Mark Giszczak, were published in the September 2021 issue. And we are very pleased to present the following four studies, fine examples of the current critical study of this influential text, and we would like to thank Matthias Henze, editor of JSP, for the opportunity and for all of the guidance he has graciously offered in getting out and presenting what we hope will be an important contribution to the study of the Wisdom of Solomon. Karina Martin Hogan in her article, “Ahistorical Interpretation of the Torah Narratives in the Wisdom of Solomon,” tackles one of the more debated questions in the history of research on the text, the confounding lack of proper nouns or precise character descriptions in the final nine chapters of the book. Hogan calls into question the traditional designation of this section as the “Book of History,” as the Torah narrative is presented not as a record of historical events but rather as a mythos, as paradigmatic stories designed to educate. Hogan closely examines three examples—the first Antithesis (11:1–14), the","PeriodicalId":14859,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09518207211058998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The following is the second special issue of the Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha (JSP) devoted to studies of the Wisdom of Solomon, edited by Karina Martin Hogan and Jason Zurawski. The collection of papers largely derives from three sessions of the Wisdom and Apocalypticism program unit of the Society of Biblical Literature focused on the important first-century text: “The Wisdom of Solomon at the Crossroads of Wisdom, Apocalypticism, and Philosophy” (2018, Denver); “Knowledge and the Cosmos in the Wisdom of Solomon” (2019, San Diego); and “The Wisdom of Solomon” (2020, online). The first four articles, by Emma Wasserman, Benjamin Wold, Bradley Gregory, and Mark Giszczak, were published in the September 2021 issue. And we are very pleased to present the following four studies, fine examples of the current critical study of this influential text, and we would like to thank Matthias Henze, editor of JSP, for the opportunity and for all of the guidance he has graciously offered in getting out and presenting what we hope will be an important contribution to the study of the Wisdom of Solomon. Karina Martin Hogan in her article, “Ahistorical Interpretation of the Torah Narratives in the Wisdom of Solomon,” tackles one of the more debated questions in the history of research on the text, the confounding lack of proper nouns or precise character descriptions in the final nine chapters of the book. Hogan calls into question the traditional designation of this section as the “Book of History,” as the Torah narrative is presented not as a record of historical events but rather as a mythos, as paradigmatic stories designed to educate. Hogan closely examines three examples—the first Antithesis (11:1–14), the
以下是由Karina Martin Hogan和Jason Zurawski编辑的《伪典研究杂志》(JSP)专门研究所罗门智慧的第二期特刊。这些论文主要来自圣经文学学会智慧与启示项目单元的三次会议,重点关注第一世纪的重要文本:“所罗门在智慧、启示和哲学的十字路口的智慧”(2018年,丹佛);《所罗门智慧中的知识与宇宙》(2019年,圣地亚哥);《所罗门的智慧》(2020,在线)。由Emma Wasserman, Benjamin Wold, Bradley Gregory和Mark Giszczak撰写的前四篇文章发表在2021年9月号上。我们很高兴为大家介绍以下四篇研究,这是当前对这篇有影响力的文本进行批判性研究的好例子,我们要感谢JSP的编辑马蒂亚斯·亨泽,感谢他提供的机会以及他所提供的所有指导我们希望这些研究将对所罗门智慧的研究做出重要贡献。卡琳娜·马丁·霍根(Karina Martin Hogan)在她的文章《所罗门智慧中的托拉叙事的非历史解读》(a - historical Interpretation of Torah Narratives in the Wisdom of Solomon)中,解决了历史上对该文本的研究中一个更有争议的问题,即该书最后九章缺乏专有名词或精确的人物描述,令人困惑。霍根对传统上将这一部分称为“历史之书”的说法提出了质疑,因为《托拉》的叙述不是作为历史事件的记录,而是作为神话,作为旨在教育的范例故事。霍根仔细研究了三个例子——第一个反题(11:1-14)
期刊介绍:
The last twenty years have witnessed some remarkable achievements in the study of early Jewish literature. Given the ever-increasing number and availability of primary sources for these writings, specialists have been producing text-critical, historical, social scientific, and theological studies which, in turn, have fuelled a growing interest among scholars, students, religious leaders, and the wider public. The only English journal of its kind, Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha was founded in 1987 to provide a much-needed forum for scholars to discuss and review most recent developments in this burgeoning field in the academy.