#BLM Insurgent Discourse, White Structures of Feeling and the Fate of the 2020 "Racial Awakening"

IF 0.8 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Long Le-Khac, Maria Antoniak, R. So
{"title":"#BLM Insurgent Discourse, White Structures of Feeling and the Fate of the 2020 \"Racial Awakening\"","authors":"Long Le-Khac, Maria Antoniak, R. So","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2022.a898325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Working with Twitter data, this paper offers new findings on the #BlackLivesMatter movement and \"racial awakening\" of summer 2020. Framing methods to address this important moment, this paper contends that cultural studies and critical race studies can be enriched through an engagement with new computational approaches. We analyze how white and racial minority voices talked about race and track their fraught contestation for leadership of racial discourse over the summer of 2020. We uncover a surprising story of white colorblindness even in the midst of a \"racial awakening,\" a story that questions claims that the Trump presidency and the summer of 2020 ushered in a new era of US racial consciousness. And we show how a Black and minority discourse with transformative potential surged and receded. For cultural studies, our data and analysis revise Raymond Williams's influential model of cultural evolution by introducing a new concept: the insurgent, a long-building minority cultural strain that surges to contest the dominant culture in a moment of crisis. For critical race studies, our findings revise prominent theorizations of colorblindness, racial ideology, and hegemony. By revealing the messy and unconscious feelings characterizing colorblindness, our data contest theorizations of colorblindness as an ideology and counter the focus on articulate beliefs in theories of racial hegemony. Ultimately, this paper shows that bringing data methods focused on moments of cultural contestation and mass communication into dialogue with field-specific theory and qualitative analyses can expand our models of how race, discourse, and culture operate.","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":"54 1","pages":"667 - 692"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2022.a898325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Working with Twitter data, this paper offers new findings on the #BlackLivesMatter movement and "racial awakening" of summer 2020. Framing methods to address this important moment, this paper contends that cultural studies and critical race studies can be enriched through an engagement with new computational approaches. We analyze how white and racial minority voices talked about race and track their fraught contestation for leadership of racial discourse over the summer of 2020. We uncover a surprising story of white colorblindness even in the midst of a "racial awakening," a story that questions claims that the Trump presidency and the summer of 2020 ushered in a new era of US racial consciousness. And we show how a Black and minority discourse with transformative potential surged and receded. For cultural studies, our data and analysis revise Raymond Williams's influential model of cultural evolution by introducing a new concept: the insurgent, a long-building minority cultural strain that surges to contest the dominant culture in a moment of crisis. For critical race studies, our findings revise prominent theorizations of colorblindness, racial ideology, and hegemony. By revealing the messy and unconscious feelings characterizing colorblindness, our data contest theorizations of colorblindness as an ideology and counter the focus on articulate beliefs in theories of racial hegemony. Ultimately, this paper shows that bringing data methods focused on moments of cultural contestation and mass communication into dialogue with field-specific theory and qualitative analyses can expand our models of how race, discourse, and culture operate.
#BLM反叛话语、白人情感结构与2020年“种族觉醒”的命运
摘要:本文利用推特数据,提供了关于2020年夏天#BlackLivesMatter运动和“种族觉醒”的新发现。为了应对这一重要时刻,本文认为,文化研究和批判性种族研究可以通过新的计算方法来丰富。我们分析了白人和少数种族的声音是如何谈论种族的,并追踪了他们在2020年夏天对种族话语领导权的激烈争夺。我们发现了一个白人色盲的惊人故事,即使在“种族觉醒”的过程中,这个故事也质疑特朗普总统任期和2020年夏天开启了美国种族意识的新时代。我们展示了具有变革潜力的黑人和少数族裔话语是如何激增和消退的。对于文化研究,我们的数据和分析通过引入一个新的概念来修正Raymond Williams有影响力的文化进化模型:反叛者,一种长期存在的少数民族文化菌株,在危机时刻激增,与占主导地位的文化竞争。对于批判性种族研究,我们的发现修正了色盲、种族意识形态和霸权的突出理论。通过揭示色盲特有的混乱和无意识的感觉,我们的数据对色盲作为一种意识形态的理论提出了质疑,并反驳了种族霸权理论中对明确信仰的关注。最终,本文表明,将关注文化争论和大众传播时刻的数据方法与特定领域的理论和定性分析相结合,可以扩展我们对种族、话语和文化运作的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Literary History
New Literary History LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信