Wall Street’s Practice of Compelling Confidentiality of Private Underwriting Fees: An Antitrust Violation?

Q2 Social Sciences
Thomas C. Willcox
{"title":"Wall Street’s Practice of Compelling Confidentiality of Private Underwriting Fees: An Antitrust Violation?","authors":"Thomas C. Willcox","doi":"10.1177/0003603x231180244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A small oligopoly of commercial and investment banks dominates the arranging and underwriting of loans and bonds for publicly traded companies. The oligopoly’s dominance apparently compels nondisclosure of preliminary agreements that outline the proposed issuance terms of the loans or bonds. Also, the banks do not disclose the arranging and underwriting fees to anyone outside the oligopoly and prohibit disclosure to anyone by their customers, which non-disclosure violates the securities laws. This makes it impossible for customers to compare such fees and more difficult for non-oligopoly banks to offer competing bids. This article concludes the Antitrust Division, and Securities & Exchange Commission should investigate these practices.","PeriodicalId":36832,"journal":{"name":"Antitrust Bulletin","volume":"68 1","pages":"363 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antitrust Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x231180244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A small oligopoly of commercial and investment banks dominates the arranging and underwriting of loans and bonds for publicly traded companies. The oligopoly’s dominance apparently compels nondisclosure of preliminary agreements that outline the proposed issuance terms of the loans or bonds. Also, the banks do not disclose the arranging and underwriting fees to anyone outside the oligopoly and prohibit disclosure to anyone by their customers, which non-disclosure violates the securities laws. This makes it impossible for customers to compare such fees and more difficult for non-oligopoly banks to offer competing bids. This article concludes the Antitrust Division, and Securities & Exchange Commission should investigate these practices.
华尔街强制保密私人承销费用的做法:违反反垄断法?
商业和投资银行的小型寡头垄断主导着上市公司贷款和债券的安排和承销。寡头垄断的主导地位显然迫使对概述贷款或债券拟议发行条款的初步协议保密。此外,银行不向寡头垄断之外的任何人披露安排和承销费用,并禁止其客户向任何人披露,这违反了证券法。这使得客户无法比较此类费用,非寡头银行也更难提供竞争性报价。这篇文章的结论是,反垄断部门和证券交易委员会应该调查这些做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antitrust Bulletin
Antitrust Bulletin Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信