II. The Baltic Region

Q4 Social Sciences
Tomas Jermalavičius, Eerik Marmei
{"title":"II. The Baltic Region","authors":"Tomas Jermalavičius, Eerik Marmei","doi":"10.1080/02681307.2018.1508959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, Central and Eastern European states understood that they could only ensure their future security and wellbeing by fully integrating with Western institutions. The Baltic States’ accession to NATO and the EU involved a long process that started soon after independence. While their consensus on joining NATO was strong, it was more difficult to secure agreement from existing members. The relatively weak defence capabilities of the Baltic States, Russia’s objections to NATO enlargement, and a lack of vision and political will of some Allies were the main obstacles to Baltic membership. For Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, integration into NATO turned out to be politically a more arduous journey than joining the EU. Nevertheless, having welcomed Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary to its ranks at its 1999 Summit in Washington, DC, NATO reaffirmed its commitment to the enlargement process and presented nine aspirant countries – including the three Baltic States – with Membership Action Plans (MAP). In 2002, at its summit in Prague, NATO decided to invite Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia to begin accession talks to join the Alliance, which culminated in their membership on 29 March 2004. As a practical manifestation of the benefits of membership and burden-sharing, the Allies immediately launched the Baltic Air Policing (BAP) operation – a peacetime mission to patrol the Baltic States’ airspace. Conducted from an airbase in Lithuania, it remained NATO’s only form of presence in the Baltics for more than a decade. Historical experience and concerns about an uncertain future acted as powerful driving forces for the Baltic States to seek stronger protection against threats to their statehood. A common guiding principle of their foreign and security policies since regaining independence has been ‘never alone again’, which meant that they took a path of full integration","PeriodicalId":37791,"journal":{"name":"Whitehall Papers","volume":"93 1","pages":"23 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02681307.2018.1508959","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whitehall Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02681307.2018.1508959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, Central and Eastern European states understood that they could only ensure their future security and wellbeing by fully integrating with Western institutions. The Baltic States’ accession to NATO and the EU involved a long process that started soon after independence. While their consensus on joining NATO was strong, it was more difficult to secure agreement from existing members. The relatively weak defence capabilities of the Baltic States, Russia’s objections to NATO enlargement, and a lack of vision and political will of some Allies were the main obstacles to Baltic membership. For Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, integration into NATO turned out to be politically a more arduous journey than joining the EU. Nevertheless, having welcomed Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary to its ranks at its 1999 Summit in Washington, DC, NATO reaffirmed its commitment to the enlargement process and presented nine aspirant countries – including the three Baltic States – with Membership Action Plans (MAP). In 2002, at its summit in Prague, NATO decided to invite Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia to begin accession talks to join the Alliance, which culminated in their membership on 29 March 2004. As a practical manifestation of the benefits of membership and burden-sharing, the Allies immediately launched the Baltic Air Policing (BAP) operation – a peacetime mission to patrol the Baltic States’ airspace. Conducted from an airbase in Lithuania, it remained NATO’s only form of presence in the Baltics for more than a decade. Historical experience and concerns about an uncertain future acted as powerful driving forces for the Baltic States to seek stronger protection against threats to their statehood. A common guiding principle of their foreign and security policies since regaining independence has been ‘never alone again’, which meant that they took a path of full integration
二、波罗的海地区
冷战结束和苏联解体后,中欧和东欧国家明白,只有与西方机构充分融合,才能确保未来的安全和福祉。波罗的海国家加入北约和欧盟是在独立后不久开始的一个漫长过程。虽然他们在加入北约问题上达成了强烈的共识,但要获得现有成员国的同意却更加困难。波罗的海国家相对薄弱的防御能力,俄罗斯反对北约东扩,以及一些盟国缺乏远见和政治意愿是波罗的海加入北约的主要障碍。对爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛来说,加入北约在政治上比加入欧盟更加艰难。然而,北约在1999年华盛顿首脑会议上欢迎波兰、捷克共和国和匈牙利加入其行列后,重申了其对扩大进程的承诺,并向包括波罗的海三国在内的九个有抱负的国家提出了成员行动计划(MAP)。2002年,在布拉格举行的首脑会议上,北约决定邀请保加利亚、爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、罗马尼亚、斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚开始入盟谈判,最终于2004年3月29日成为北约成员国。作为成员国身份和分担责任的实际体现,盟国立即启动了波罗的海空中治安行动,这是一项和平时期在波罗的海国家领空巡逻的任务。它从立陶宛的一个空军基地指挥,十多年来一直是北约在波罗的海地区的唯一存在形式。历史经验和对不确定的未来的担忧成为波罗的海国家寻求更强有力的保护以防止其国家地位受到威胁的强大动力。自获得独立以来,它们的外交和安全政策的共同指导原则是“永不再孤立”,这意味着它们走上了完全一体化的道路
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Whitehall Papers
Whitehall Papers Social Sciences-Archeology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Whitehall Paper series provides in-depth studies of specific developments, issues or themes in the field of national and international defence and security. Published three times a year, Whitehall Papers reflect the highest standards of original research and analysis, and are invaluable background material for policy-makers and specialists alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信