Status of the BOLD reference library of DNA barcodes of caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Western Balkans

IF 0.2 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOLOGY
Lejla Usanovic, Dalila Destanović, Lejla Lasić, Jasna Hanjalić Kurtović, F. Costa, Belma Kalamujić Stroil
{"title":"Status of the BOLD reference library of DNA barcodes of caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Western Balkans","authors":"Lejla Usanovic, Dalila Destanović, Lejla Lasić, Jasna Hanjalić Kurtović, F. Costa, Belma Kalamujić Stroil","doi":"10.18054/pb.v124i3-4.24754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and purpose: Available data in research literature suggest that the Western Balkan countries hold a rich diversity of caddisflies. Assessment and biomonitoring of such rich diversity could be facilitated through DNA-based high-throughput approaches like DNA metabarcoding that depend on the availability of comprehensive reference libraries.\nMaterials and methods: We assessed the status of the COI barcode sequence data for a total of 112 caddisflies species in the investigated region by determining the gaps in representative sequences in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) and examining the accuracy of available records using the Barcode, Audit and Grade System (BAGS).\nResults: Results revealed a considerable underrepresentation of surveyed geographic region in BOLD records for the target insect group. Moreover, the large majority of the species records were rated “discordant” (72.80% grade E), and only 15.20% were classified as “consolidated concordance or basal concordance” (3.20% grade A and 12.00% B). Approximately 3.20% of the records pertaining to species occurring in multiple BINs (Barcode Index Number) and 8.80% were poorly represented (i.e., less than three specimens, grade D). A fraction of the species graded discordant were deemed concordant after detailed inspection of individual data, decreasing by 14.07%.\nConclusions: The assessment of the current state of BOLD entries indicated that DNA barcoding is still not widely applied in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, and Slovenia, emphasizing that Croatia has the most barcoded caddisflies species. The finding that available BOLD Trichopteran records for investigated countries were mainly graded as “discordant” indicates the need for better quality control of reference libraries.","PeriodicalId":19950,"journal":{"name":"Periodicum Biologorum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodicum Biologorum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18054/pb.v124i3-4.24754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Available data in research literature suggest that the Western Balkan countries hold a rich diversity of caddisflies. Assessment and biomonitoring of such rich diversity could be facilitated through DNA-based high-throughput approaches like DNA metabarcoding that depend on the availability of comprehensive reference libraries. Materials and methods: We assessed the status of the COI barcode sequence data for a total of 112 caddisflies species in the investigated region by determining the gaps in representative sequences in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) and examining the accuracy of available records using the Barcode, Audit and Grade System (BAGS). Results: Results revealed a considerable underrepresentation of surveyed geographic region in BOLD records for the target insect group. Moreover, the large majority of the species records were rated “discordant” (72.80% grade E), and only 15.20% were classified as “consolidated concordance or basal concordance” (3.20% grade A and 12.00% B). Approximately 3.20% of the records pertaining to species occurring in multiple BINs (Barcode Index Number) and 8.80% were poorly represented (i.e., less than three specimens, grade D). A fraction of the species graded discordant were deemed concordant after detailed inspection of individual data, decreasing by 14.07%. Conclusions: The assessment of the current state of BOLD entries indicated that DNA barcoding is still not widely applied in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, and Slovenia, emphasizing that Croatia has the most barcoded caddisflies species. The finding that available BOLD Trichopteran records for investigated countries were mainly graded as “discordant” indicates the need for better quality control of reference libraries.
西巴尔干地区热蝇(虫纲:毛翅目)DNA条形码BOLD参考文库现状
背景和目的:研究文献中的现有数据表明,西巴尔干国家拥有丰富多样的球虱。通过基于DNA的高通量方法,如DNA元条形码,可以促进对这种丰富多样性的评估和生物监测,这种方法依赖于综合参考文库的可用性。材料和方法:通过确定生命条形码数据系统(BOLD)中代表性序列的缺口,并使用条形码、审计和分级系统(BAGS)检查现有记录的准确性,对调查地区共112种球蝇的COI条形码序列数据进行了评估。结果:结果显示,在所调查的地理区域中,对目标昆虫群的BOLD记录的代表性相当不足。此外,绝大多数物种记录被评为“不一致”(72.80%为E级),只有15.20%的物种记录被评为“统一一致或基本一致”(3.20%为A级,12.00%为B级)。大约3.20%的物种记录属于多个bin(条形码索引号),8.80%的物种记录代表性不足(即少于3个标本)。D级)。在对个别数据进行详细检查后,有一部分物种被认为是和谐的,减少了14.07%。结论:对BOLD条目现状的评估表明,DNA条形码在阿尔巴尼亚、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、黑山、北马其顿、塞尔维亚和斯洛文尼亚仍未得到广泛应用,强调克罗地亚拥有最多的条形码球虱物种。调查国家现有的BOLD Trichopteran记录主要被评为“不一致”,这一发现表明需要对参考图书馆进行更好的质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Periodicum Biologorum
Periodicum Biologorum 生物-生物学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信