Figuring Tough Subjects: Vague Labor and Narratorial Detection in Bleak House

IF 0.6 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Alexander Lynch
{"title":"Figuring Tough Subjects: Vague Labor and Narratorial Detection in Bleak House","authors":"Alexander Lynch","doi":"10.5325/dickstudannu.54.2.0147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines Dickens’s Bleak House alongside the history of crossing-sweeping, a species of “vague” labor whose variable duties frustrated practices of Foucauldian discipline inside and outside Victorian novels. To depict this labor, the article argues, Dickens’s novel makes use of the flexible mechanisms of social management Foucault calls “security,” and, more specifically, the aesthetic infrastructure of these mechanisms, a regime of representation the essay terms “figural.” This regime mobilizes “typical” personae, like “the crossing-sweeper” and “the nervous woman,” to represent and regulate ungraspable groups. These vaguely formulated figures, the article shows, “problematize” those persons who resemble them, making them objects of action within relevant dispositifs (e.g., health, criminality, sexuality). By recounting the figural pursuits of his crossing-sweeper (Jo) by a police detective (Inspector Bucket), other professionals, and laypeople, Dickens ironizes the use of figures, exposing figures’ typifying effects and the absurd presumptions of “narratorial” omniscience they license. In turn, Dickens illuminates the violent abstractions effected by the agencies that deploy figures to regulate social vagueness. By moving between figures’ police-effects and figural policing, this article expands the history of police detection to include its participation in regimes of representation and traces the figural interventions central to the novel form.","PeriodicalId":53232,"journal":{"name":"Dickens Studies Annual","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dickens Studies Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/dickstudannu.54.2.0147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines Dickens’s Bleak House alongside the history of crossing-sweeping, a species of “vague” labor whose variable duties frustrated practices of Foucauldian discipline inside and outside Victorian novels. To depict this labor, the article argues, Dickens’s novel makes use of the flexible mechanisms of social management Foucault calls “security,” and, more specifically, the aesthetic infrastructure of these mechanisms, a regime of representation the essay terms “figural.” This regime mobilizes “typical” personae, like “the crossing-sweeper” and “the nervous woman,” to represent and regulate ungraspable groups. These vaguely formulated figures, the article shows, “problematize” those persons who resemble them, making them objects of action within relevant dispositifs (e.g., health, criminality, sexuality). By recounting the figural pursuits of his crossing-sweeper (Jo) by a police detective (Inspector Bucket), other professionals, and laypeople, Dickens ironizes the use of figures, exposing figures’ typifying effects and the absurd presumptions of “narratorial” omniscience they license. In turn, Dickens illuminates the violent abstractions effected by the agencies that deploy figures to regulate social vagueness. By moving between figures’ police-effects and figural policing, this article expands the history of police detection to include its participation in regimes of representation and traces the figural interventions central to the novel form.
厘清棘手的主题:《荒凉山庄》中的模糊劳动与叙事侦查
这篇文章考察了狄更斯的《荒凉山庄》以及清扫工人的历史,这是一种“模糊的”劳动,其多变的职责使维多利亚时代小说内外的福柯式纪律实践受挫。文章认为,为了描绘这种劳动,狄更斯的小说利用了福柯称之为“安全”的灵活的社会管理机制,更具体地说,是这些机制的美学基础设施,一种被文章称为“形象”的表现制度。这个政权动员了“典型的”人物,比如“马路清洁工”和“紧张的女人”,来代表和规范难以理解的群体。文章指出,这些模模糊糊的数字使那些与他们相似的人“成问题”,使他们成为相关处置(例如卫生、犯罪、性)的行动对象。通过叙述一个侦探(巴克特探长)、其他专业人士和外行人对他笔下的清洁工(乔)的形象追求,狄更斯讽刺了人物的使用,揭露了人物的典型效果,以及他们许可的“叙事”无所不知的荒谬假设。反过来,狄更斯阐释了那些利用数字来规范社会模糊的机构所影响的暴力抽象。通过在人物的警察效应和人物警务之间移动,本文扩展了警察侦查的历史,包括其对代表制度的参与,并追溯了对这种新形式的核心人物干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dickens Studies Annual
Dickens Studies Annual LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
自引率
87.50%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信