The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Robert Grant, Anupama Phene
{"title":"The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential","authors":"Robert Grant,&nbsp;Anupama Phene","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>The centrality of knowledge to the global arena has allowed scholars in this area to play a leading role in developing the knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm. We propose that broadening the KBV to take account of the social constructionist approach to knowledge and the multilevel nature of knowledge processes, can build a more serviceable knowledge-based theory of global strategy. Specifically, we urge research in three directions, the exploration of a KBV of economic organization in a global context, which would encompass macro institutions as well as individuals; focus on the foundational construct of knowledge that would integrate human and machine learning in the global arena; and the creation of a comprehensive framework of knowledge types and knowledge processes across space.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Lack of consensus over the nature of knowledge has prevented the KBV from developing into an integrated, stand-alone theory of the MNE, but has not constrained its ability to provide penetrating insights into global strategy and the management of the MNE. Empirical research shows that the processes through which knowledge is generated and applied in the global arena are complex and contextually differentiated. To extend and synthesize our understanding of these complex processes, we propose the development of a knowledge based theory of global strategy. We advocate extending the KBV in three areas, first, consideration of a KBV of organization in a global context that extends beyond the MNE to consider institutions and individuals, second, a focus on knowledge as a key construct to incorporate recent technological advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning, and third, development of a framework of types and processes of knowledge that have implications for management across locations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/gsj.1399","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Research Summary

The centrality of knowledge to the global arena has allowed scholars in this area to play a leading role in developing the knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm. We propose that broadening the KBV to take account of the social constructionist approach to knowledge and the multilevel nature of knowledge processes, can build a more serviceable knowledge-based theory of global strategy. Specifically, we urge research in three directions, the exploration of a KBV of economic organization in a global context, which would encompass macro institutions as well as individuals; focus on the foundational construct of knowledge that would integrate human and machine learning in the global arena; and the creation of a comprehensive framework of knowledge types and knowledge processes across space.

Managerial Summary

Lack of consensus over the nature of knowledge has prevented the KBV from developing into an integrated, stand-alone theory of the MNE, but has not constrained its ability to provide penetrating insights into global strategy and the management of the MNE. Empirical research shows that the processes through which knowledge is generated and applied in the global arena are complex and contextually differentiated. To extend and synthesize our understanding of these complex processes, we propose the development of a knowledge based theory of global strategy. We advocate extending the KBV in three areas, first, consideration of a KBV of organization in a global context that extends beyond the MNE to consider institutions and individuals, second, a focus on knowledge as a key construct to incorporate recent technological advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning, and third, development of a framework of types and processes of knowledge that have implications for management across locations.

基于知识的观点和全球战略:过去的影响和未来的潜力
知识在全球舞台上的中心地位使这一领域的学者在发展企业知识基础观(KBV)方面发挥了主导作用。我们建议拓宽KBV以考虑社会建构主义的知识方法和知识过程的多层次性质,可以建立一个更实用的基于知识的全球战略理论。具体而言,我们敦促从三个方向进行研究:探索全球背景下的经济组织的KBV,这将包括宏观机构和个人;关注知识的基础构建,将人类和机器学习整合到全球舞台上;以及创建跨空间的知识类型和知识过程的综合框架。缺乏对知识本质的共识阻碍了KBV发展成为一个综合的、独立的跨国公司理论,但这并没有限制它对跨国公司的全球战略和管理提供深刻见解的能力。实证研究表明,在全球范围内产生和应用知识的过程是复杂的,并且在不同的背景下存在差异。为了扩展和综合我们对这些复杂过程的理解,我们建议发展一种基于知识的全球战略理论。我们主张将KBV扩展到三个方面:第一,在全球范围内考虑组织的KBV,超越跨国公司,考虑机构和个人;第二,关注知识,将其作为融合人工智能和机器学习最新技术进步的关键结构;第三,开发对跨地区管理有影响的知识类型和过程框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信