Sentiment Analysis on COVID-19 Vaccine using Naive Bayes Classifier, Support Vector Machine and K-Nearest Neighbors

M. Rani, Dian Prawira, Nurul Mutiah
{"title":"Sentiment Analysis on COVID-19 Vaccine using Naive Bayes Classifier, Support Vector Machine and K-Nearest Neighbors","authors":"M. Rani, Dian Prawira, Nurul Mutiah","doi":"10.24114/cess.v8i1.40158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Procurement of the COVID-19 vaccination has led to diverse opinions among Indonesian people on Twitter. Sentiment analysis on Twitter can be carried out to find out public opinion, especially among Twitter users. The data was used in the form of tweets with the topic of the COVID-19 vaccine using the keywords covid 19 vaccine, covid vaccine, AstraZeneca, Sinovac, Moderna, Pfizer, Novavax and Sinopharm. analysis of the performance of the Naive Bayes Classifier, Support Vector Machine and K-Nearest Neighbors algorithms to determine the results of the accuracy level between the algorithms. The highest classification test is using the Support Vector Machine with an accuracy rate of 0.701. The results of the comparison of algorithms tested using tweet data on the topic of the COVID-19 vaccine found that the Support Vector Machine was better than the Naive Bayes Classifier and K-Nearest Neighbors. From the classification test carried out using COVID-19 vaccine tweet data with 2500 data. The amount of data after going through the data processing process is 1052 data. Neutral sentiment results in as many as 645 positive sentiments as many as 250 and negative sentiments as many as 157.","PeriodicalId":53361,"journal":{"name":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v8i1.40158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Procurement of the COVID-19 vaccination has led to diverse opinions among Indonesian people on Twitter. Sentiment analysis on Twitter can be carried out to find out public opinion, especially among Twitter users. The data was used in the form of tweets with the topic of the COVID-19 vaccine using the keywords covid 19 vaccine, covid vaccine, AstraZeneca, Sinovac, Moderna, Pfizer, Novavax and Sinopharm. analysis of the performance of the Naive Bayes Classifier, Support Vector Machine and K-Nearest Neighbors algorithms to determine the results of the accuracy level between the algorithms. The highest classification test is using the Support Vector Machine with an accuracy rate of 0.701. The results of the comparison of algorithms tested using tweet data on the topic of the COVID-19 vaccine found that the Support Vector Machine was better than the Naive Bayes Classifier and K-Nearest Neighbors. From the classification test carried out using COVID-19 vaccine tweet data with 2500 data. The amount of data after going through the data processing process is 1052 data. Neutral sentiment results in as many as 645 positive sentiments as many as 250 and negative sentiments as many as 157.
基于朴素贝叶斯分类器、支持向量机和k近邻的COVID-19疫苗情感分析
新冠肺炎疫苗的采购在推特上引发了印尼民众的不同意见。推特上的情绪分析可以用来了解公众舆论,尤其是推特用户。该数据以推特的形式使用,主题为新冠肺炎疫苗,使用关键字新冠肺炎19疫苗、新冠肺炎疫苗、阿斯利康、科兴、莫德纳、辉瑞、诺瓦瓦克斯和国药集团。分析了Naive Bayes分类器、支持向量机和K-近邻算法的性能,确定了算法之间的精度水平。最高的分类测试是使用准确率为0.701的支持向量机。使用新冠肺炎疫苗主题的推特数据测试的算法的比较结果发现,支持向量机优于Naive Bayes分类器和K-Nearest Neighbors。从使用新冠肺炎疫苗推特数据进行的分类测试中获得2500个数据。经过数据处理过程之后的数据量是1052个数据。中性情绪导致多达645种积极情绪,多达250种,消极情绪多达157种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信