Selected microhabitat and surface temperatures of two sympatric lizard species

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Anamarija Žagar , Veronica Gomes , Neftalí Sillero
{"title":"Selected microhabitat and surface temperatures of two sympatric lizard species","authors":"Anamarija Žagar ,&nbsp;Veronica Gomes ,&nbsp;Neftalí Sillero","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2022.103887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many small lizards live in structurally and thermally heterogeneous environments where they can select preferred microhabitats and surface temperatures to optimize their activity. We examined microhabitat selection and analyzed surface temperatures selected by two ecologically similar lacertid species, <em>Iberolacerta horvathi</em> and <em>Podarcis muralis</em>, at three sites and in different ecological contexts: allotopic and syntopic conditions. We examined their microhabitat and spatial thermal selection by using high-precision geolocation techniques to locate the lizards and record surface temperatures with temperature data loggers. Microhabitat and thermal availability differed among sites: the <em>I. horvathi</em> allotopic site had more rock surfaces and was coldest; the <em>P. muralis</em> allotopic site had more ground surfaces and was warmer; and the syntopic site had the greatest surface and thermal heterogeneity. Our results highlight the differences in microhabitat selection between the two species, most notably in surface selection, but also in thermal characteristics. <em>I. horvathi</em> preferentially and almost exclusively selected rocks. <em>P. muralis</em> chose soil, but with a more general use of microhabitats. <em>I. horvathi</em> lizards chose colder temperatures than those available, while <em>P. muralis</em> chose higher temperatures than those available. Both species showed no differences in microhabitat selection between allotopic and syntopic sites, which could not be explained by differences between sites. Our results provided new insights into the difference in surface temperature selection between two lizard species that may be adapted to different environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X22000777","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many small lizards live in structurally and thermally heterogeneous environments where they can select preferred microhabitats and surface temperatures to optimize their activity. We examined microhabitat selection and analyzed surface temperatures selected by two ecologically similar lacertid species, Iberolacerta horvathi and Podarcis muralis, at three sites and in different ecological contexts: allotopic and syntopic conditions. We examined their microhabitat and spatial thermal selection by using high-precision geolocation techniques to locate the lizards and record surface temperatures with temperature data loggers. Microhabitat and thermal availability differed among sites: the I. horvathi allotopic site had more rock surfaces and was coldest; the P. muralis allotopic site had more ground surfaces and was warmer; and the syntopic site had the greatest surface and thermal heterogeneity. Our results highlight the differences in microhabitat selection between the two species, most notably in surface selection, but also in thermal characteristics. I. horvathi preferentially and almost exclusively selected rocks. P. muralis chose soil, but with a more general use of microhabitats. I. horvathi lizards chose colder temperatures than those available, while P. muralis chose higher temperatures than those available. Both species showed no differences in microhabitat selection between allotopic and syntopic sites, which could not be explained by differences between sites. Our results provided new insights into the difference in surface temperature selection between two lizard species that may be adapted to different environments.

两种同域蜥蜴的微生境选择和地表温度
许多小蜥蜴生活在结构和热不均的环境中,它们可以选择首选的微栖息地和表面温度来优化它们的活动。研究了两种生态相似的乳虫物种——霍瓦伊乳虫(Iberolacerta horvathi)和泥鳅(Podarcis muralis)在不同的异位和合位环境下的微生境选择,并分析了它们选择的地表温度。我们利用高精度地理定位技术对其进行定位,并利用温度数据记录仪记录地表温度,研究了其微栖息地和空间热选择。不同样地的微生境和热可利用性存在差异:ⅰ. horvathi异位样地岩石表面较多,温度最低;同位地点的地表较多,温度较高;合成位点具有最大的表面和热非均质性。我们的研究结果强调了两个物种在微栖息地选择上的差异,最明显的是在表面选择上,但也在热特征上。I. horvathi优先且几乎只选择岩石。绿桫椤选择土壤,但更普遍地使用微生境。I. horvathi蜥蜴选择比可用温度更低的温度,而P. muralis选择比可用温度更高的温度。两种植物的微生境选择在异位位点和合位位点之间没有差异,这不能用位点差异来解释。我们的研究结果为两种蜥蜴在适应不同环境的表面温度选择上的差异提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信