Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Patent Medicine Combined with Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Adult Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xiaona Li, Bin-Bin Liu, Na Duan, Yibai Xiong, Yan Zhang, Chi Zhang, Cheng Lu, Li Li
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Patent Medicine Combined with Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Adult Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xiaona Li, Bin-Bin Liu, Na Duan, Yibai Xiong, Yan Zhang, Chi Zhang, Cheng Lu, Li Li","doi":"10.1142/S0192415X22500422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Influenza is a sudden and serious viral breathing and lung-related infectious disease that causes significant deadliness and death worldwide. Now, the international treatment is oseltamivir. Chinese patent medicine (CPM) as a kind of different therapy is used in the treatment of influenza in China. The aim of this study was to interpret the clinical efficacy and safety of CPM combined with oseltamivir in the treatment of adult influenza by reviewing all relevant randomized controlled trials, and to provide new ideas and methods for the treatment of influenza. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, and Wanfang Database were searched from the date of beginning until 1 June 2021, for the references on treatment of influenza with CPM. According to standard information extraction tables, two people worked to find and aggregate information independently. Review Manager 5.2 was used to study data carefully and evaluate risk of bias. A total of nine trials of 906 patients were included. Based on the meta-analysis, compared to oseltamivir, CPM combined with oseltamivir had better effect in the time of defervescence [MD = -17.68, 95% CI (-25.93, -9.44), [Formula: see text] < 0.0001], the time of symptom improvement [MD = -22.28, 95% CI (-26.77, -17.80), [Formula: see text] < 0.00001], and the time of hospitalization [MD = -2.04, 95% CI (-3.45, -0.63), [Formula: see text] = 0.005]. Related to safety [RR = 0.69, 95% CI (0.38, 1.23), [Formula: see text] = 0.21], the experimental group had fewer adverse reactions than the control group, but there is no statistical significance. The findings show that CPM combined with oseltamivir in adult influenza has a better efficacy in shortening the time of defervescence and symptom improvement, reducing the time of hospitalization. However, publication bias is inevitable due to the low methodological quality check of the clinical research about diagnostic criteria, definition of adult influenza, and small number of articles, and further large sample sizes and multi-center clinical trials are needed to give better proof for its efficacy and safety.","PeriodicalId":94221,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of Chinese medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of Chinese medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X22500422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Influenza is a sudden and serious viral breathing and lung-related infectious disease that causes significant deadliness and death worldwide. Now, the international treatment is oseltamivir. Chinese patent medicine (CPM) as a kind of different therapy is used in the treatment of influenza in China. The aim of this study was to interpret the clinical efficacy and safety of CPM combined with oseltamivir in the treatment of adult influenza by reviewing all relevant randomized controlled trials, and to provide new ideas and methods for the treatment of influenza. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, and Wanfang Database were searched from the date of beginning until 1 June 2021, for the references on treatment of influenza with CPM. According to standard information extraction tables, two people worked to find and aggregate information independently. Review Manager 5.2 was used to study data carefully and evaluate risk of bias. A total of nine trials of 906 patients were included. Based on the meta-analysis, compared to oseltamivir, CPM combined with oseltamivir had better effect in the time of defervescence [MD = -17.68, 95% CI (-25.93, -9.44), [Formula: see text] < 0.0001], the time of symptom improvement [MD = -22.28, 95% CI (-26.77, -17.80), [Formula: see text] < 0.00001], and the time of hospitalization [MD = -2.04, 95% CI (-3.45, -0.63), [Formula: see text] = 0.005]. Related to safety [RR = 0.69, 95% CI (0.38, 1.23), [Formula: see text] = 0.21], the experimental group had fewer adverse reactions than the control group, but there is no statistical significance. The findings show that CPM combined with oseltamivir in adult influenza has a better efficacy in shortening the time of defervescence and symptom improvement, reducing the time of hospitalization. However, publication bias is inevitable due to the low methodological quality check of the clinical research about diagnostic criteria, definition of adult influenza, and small number of articles, and further large sample sizes and multi-center clinical trials are needed to give better proof for its efficacy and safety.
中成药联合奥司他韦治疗成人流行性感冒的临床疗效和安全性:系统评价和meta分析。
流感是一种突然而严重的病毒性呼吸和肺部相关传染病,在全球范围内造成严重的死亡。现在,国际上的治疗方法是奥司他韦。中成药(CPM)作为一种不同的治疗方法在中国被用于治疗流感。本研究的目的是通过回顾所有相关的随机对照试验来解释CPM联合奥司他韦治疗成人流感的临床疗效和安全性,并为治疗流感提供新的思路和方法。检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、SinoMed、CNKI和万方数据库,从开始之日起至2021年6月1日,以查找CPM治疗流感的参考文献。根据标准的信息提取表,两个人独立地查找和汇总信息。Review Manager 5.2用于仔细研究数据并评估偏倚风险。共纳入906名患者的9项试验。基于荟萃分析,与奥司他韦相比,CPM联合奥司他维在退腾时间[MD=-17.68,95%可信区间(-25.93,-9.44),[公式:见正文]<0.00001],症状改善时间[MD=-22.28,95%置信区间(-26.77,-17.80),[方式:见正文]<0.00001]方面效果更好,和住院时间[MD=-2.04,95%可信区间(-3.45,-0.63),[公式:见正文]=0.005]。与安全性相关[RR=0.69,95%置信区间(0.38,1.23),[配方:见正文]=0.21],实验组的不良反应比对照组少,但无统计学意义。研究结果表明,CPM联合奥司他韦治疗成人流感在缩短退热时间和症状改善、缩短住院时间方面有较好的疗效。然而,由于对诊断标准、成人流感定义的临床研究方法学质量检查低,文章数量少,发表偏倚是不可避免的,需要进一步的大样本量和多中心临床试验来更好地证明其有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信