Recepção como elo da obra de arte com o mundo e com a história

Diogo de Moraes Silva
{"title":"Recepção como elo da obra de arte com o mundo e com a história","authors":"Diogo de Moraes Silva","doi":"10.11606/issn.2178-0447.ars.2020.166510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the artist’s Marcel Duchamp understanding that the public connects the artistic work with the outer world and, in doing so, contributes to its incorporation into Art History, this text seeks to outline the chain in which this reception act is inscribed. For this, it uses analysis from different fields, namely, Art, Philosophy, Semiology, Sociology, and Cultural Mediation. Mobilizing the concepts of “open work”, “art coefficient”, “aesthetic regime”, “distinction”, and “documentary mediation”, it pursues to verify both the possibilities and the limitations of a type of chain whose universality is relativized by sociocultural and class incongruities, which make the influence exercised by spectators in the directions taken by art markedly unequal.","PeriodicalId":31329,"journal":{"name":"ARS","volume":"18 1","pages":"196-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2178-0447.ars.2020.166510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the artist’s Marcel Duchamp understanding that the public connects the artistic work with the outer world and, in doing so, contributes to its incorporation into Art History, this text seeks to outline the chain in which this reception act is inscribed. For this, it uses analysis from different fields, namely, Art, Philosophy, Semiology, Sociology, and Cultural Mediation. Mobilizing the concepts of “open work”, “art coefficient”, “aesthetic regime”, “distinction”, and “documentary mediation”, it pursues to verify both the possibilities and the limitations of a type of chain whose universality is relativized by sociocultural and class incongruities, which make the influence exercised by spectators in the directions taken by art markedly unequal.
接受作为艺术作品与世界和历史的纽带
基于艺术家马塞尔·杜尚对公众将艺术作品与外部世界联系起来的理解,这样做有助于将其纳入艺术史,本文试图概述这种接受行为所包含的链条。为此,它使用了不同领域的分析,即艺术,哲学,符号学,社会学和文化调解。借助“开放作品”、“艺术系数”、“美学制度”、“区别”和“纪实调解”等概念,它试图验证一种链条的可能性和局限性,这种链条的普遍性被社会文化和阶级的不协调相对化了,这使得观众在艺术所采取的方向上施加的影响明显不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARS
ARS
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信