I. Conceptual Language: The Problem with ‘Chinese Influence’

Q4 Social Sciences
{"title":"I. Conceptual Language: The Problem with ‘Chinese Influence’","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/02681307.2020.1932352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate definition of problems is crucial to the development of effective policy responses. In his 1946 essay ‘Politics and the English Language’, George Orwell made an impassioned plea for precision in political discourse against a proliferation of vague and malleable set phrases. In national security policy, amorphous concepts such as the ‘communist threat’ during the Cold War and ‘terrorism’ after 9/11 have hindered rational assessment of the nature and magnitude of threats. Choice of language influences how the qualitative nature of a problem is understood, along with the causes that give rise to it, the broader associations that audiences will draw and the design of public policy solutions. Unfortunately, the basic terms in which the CCP and its supporters’ political activities have been discussed in English have been frequently vague and potentially misleading. As Chapter III will argue, such imprecision has contributed to unwarranted and often unintended associations between state conduct and ethnicity, misidentification of priorities for policy responses, and missed opportunities to strengthen liberal-democratic institutions.","PeriodicalId":37791,"journal":{"name":"Whitehall Papers","volume":"98 1","pages":"14 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02681307.2020.1932352","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whitehall Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02681307.2020.1932352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate definition of problems is crucial to the development of effective policy responses. In his 1946 essay ‘Politics and the English Language’, George Orwell made an impassioned plea for precision in political discourse against a proliferation of vague and malleable set phrases. In national security policy, amorphous concepts such as the ‘communist threat’ during the Cold War and ‘terrorism’ after 9/11 have hindered rational assessment of the nature and magnitude of threats. Choice of language influences how the qualitative nature of a problem is understood, along with the causes that give rise to it, the broader associations that audiences will draw and the design of public policy solutions. Unfortunately, the basic terms in which the CCP and its supporters’ political activities have been discussed in English have been frequently vague and potentially misleading. As Chapter III will argue, such imprecision has contributed to unwarranted and often unintended associations between state conduct and ethnicity, misidentification of priorities for policy responses, and missed opportunities to strengthen liberal-democratic institutions.
一、概念语言:“中国影响”的问题
准确界定问题对于制定有效的政策对策至关重要。乔治·奥威尔在1946年的文章《政治与英语》中慷慨激昂地呼吁政治话语的准确性,反对模糊和可塑的固定短语的泛滥。在国家安全政策中,诸如冷战期间的“共产主义威胁”和9/11之后的“恐怖主义”等无定形概念阻碍了对威胁性质和规模的理性评估。语言的选择会影响人们如何理解问题的定性,以及导致问题的原因、受众将产生的更广泛的联想以及公共政策解决方案的设计。不幸的是,用英语讨论中共及其支持者政治活动的基本术语经常含糊其辞,并可能产生误导。正如第三章将要指出的那样,这种不精确性导致了国家行为和种族之间不必要且往往是无意的联系,错误地确定了政策应对的优先事项,并错过了加强自由民主制度的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Whitehall Papers
Whitehall Papers Social Sciences-Archeology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Whitehall Paper series provides in-depth studies of specific developments, issues or themes in the field of national and international defence and security. Published three times a year, Whitehall Papers reflect the highest standards of original research and analysis, and are invaluable background material for policy-makers and specialists alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信