The Scholarly Impact Matrix: An Empirical Study of How Multiple Metrics Create an Informed Story of a Scholar’s Work

Q4 Social Sciences

Legal Reference Services Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-12-11 DOI:10.1080/0270319X.2020.1859841

Caroline L. Osborne, Stephanie C. Miller

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article analyzes data collected in an empirical study of citation metrics. Between February 1, 2019 and April 30, 2019, the authors collected citation data from Google Scholar, HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, SSRN, and Digital Commons repositories on randomly selected faculty members at U.S. law schools for the purpose of answering questions regarding fit and utility of citation metrics. Analysis of the citation data examines the impact of adoption of scholarly profiles, gender, stage in the profession, and discipline on exposure on citation with the conclusion that exposure results in increased citations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学术影响矩阵：多重指标如何创造学者工作的知情故事的实证研究

摘要本文分析了引用度量的实证研究中收集的数据。在2019年2月1日至2019年4月30日期间，作者从Google Scholar、HeinOnline、Westlaw、Lexis、SSRN和Digital Commons存储库中收集了美国法学院随机选择的教员的引文数据，目的是回答有关引文指标的适用性和实用性的问题。对引文数据的分析考察了学术简介、性别、职业阶段和学科的采用对引文曝光的影响，得出的结论是曝光会导致引文增加。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Legal Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： An important forum for daily problems and issues, Legal Reference Services Quarterly will assist you in your day-to-day work as it has been helping other law librarians and members of the legal profession for over a decade. You will find articles that are serious, humorous, critical, or simply helpful to the working librarian. Annotated subject bibliographies, overviews of legal literature, reviews of commonly used tools, and the inclusion of reference problems unique to corporate law libraries, judicial libraries, and academic collections will keep you up-to-date on the continuously expanding volume of legal materials and their use in legal research.