ANALISIS MATERI SULIT DIPAHAMI DAN MISKONSEPSI MAHASISWA DALAM MATA KULIAH KALKULUS INTEGRAL

Q3 Mathematics
Dona Fitriawan, Romal Ijuddin, Silvia Sayu
{"title":"ANALISIS MATERI SULIT DIPAHAMI DAN MISKONSEPSI MAHASISWA DALAM MATA KULIAH KALKULUS INTEGRAL","authors":"Dona Fitriawan, Romal Ijuddin, Silvia Sayu","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze and describe what materials are difficult in calculus courses and also materials that are misconceptions. This research was conducted to improve the competence of students in the future. The formulation of the problem in this study is \"How to improve student competence in integral calculus courses?\" The sub-problems are: 1) What materials do students have misconceptions in integral calculus courses? 2) What materials are difficult for students to understand in integral calculus courses? The research method used is descriptive qualitative by surveying students of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University. From the overall results, there were 22 students (60%) did not experience misconceptions and 14 students (40%) experienced misconceptions in the first concept. In the second concept, 40% did not experience misconceptions and 60% of students experienced misconceptions. For the third concept, 70% of students experienced misconceptions and 30% of students did not experience misconceptions. In the fourth concept, 28% of students experienced misconceptions and 72% of students did not experience misconceptions. For the fifth concept, 6% of students experienced misconceptions and 94% of students did not experience misconceptions. And for the sixth concept there are 28% of students experiencing misconceptions and 72% of students not experiencing misconceptions.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Numeracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and describe what materials are difficult in calculus courses and also materials that are misconceptions. This research was conducted to improve the competence of students in the future. The formulation of the problem in this study is "How to improve student competence in integral calculus courses?" The sub-problems are: 1) What materials do students have misconceptions in integral calculus courses? 2) What materials are difficult for students to understand in integral calculus courses? The research method used is descriptive qualitative by surveying students of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University. From the overall results, there were 22 students (60%) did not experience misconceptions and 14 students (40%) experienced misconceptions in the first concept. In the second concept, 40% did not experience misconceptions and 60% of students experienced misconceptions. For the third concept, 70% of students experienced misconceptions and 30% of students did not experience misconceptions. In the fourth concept, 28% of students experienced misconceptions and 72% of students did not experience misconceptions. For the fifth concept, 6% of students experienced misconceptions and 94% of students did not experience misconceptions. And for the sixth concept there are 28% of students experiencing misconceptions and 72% of students not experiencing misconceptions.
SULIT材料整合与错位分析
本研究旨在分析和描述微积分课程中哪些材料是困难的,以及哪些材料是误解。这项研究是为了提高学生未来的能力。本研究的问题表述为“如何提高学生在微积分课程中的能力?”子问题是:1)学生在微积分课上对哪些材料有误解?2) 在微积分课程中,学生很难理解哪些材料?研究方法采用描述性和定性的方法,对丹绒普拉大学教师培训与教育学院数学教育专业的学生进行调查。从总体结果来看,有22名学生(60%)没有经历过误解,14名学生(40%)在第一个概念中经历过误解。在第二个概念中,40%的学生没有经历过误解,60%的学生经历过误解。对于第三个概念,70%的学生经历过误解,30%的学生没有经历过误解。在第四个概念中,28%的学生经历过误解,72%的学生没有经历过误解。对于第五个概念,6%的学生有误解,94%的学生没有误解。对于第六个概念,28%的学生有误解,72%的学生没有误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Numeracy
Numeracy Mathematics-Mathematics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信