Money as a political institution in the commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to Aristotle's "Ethica Nicomachea"

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS
Tommaso Brollo
{"title":"Money as a political institution in the commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to Aristotle's \"Ethica Nicomachea\"","authors":"Tommaso Brollo","doi":"10.3280/spe2019-002002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Often, contemporary studies maintain that mediaeval thinkers regarded money as a commodity, a metal valuable only according to its intrinsic value; however, a thorough textual examination reveals that they were first and foremost concerned with its institutional dimension as a nomothetic moment of community building. This contribution aims at clarifying the late mediaeval conceptualisation of the nature of money as it emerges from the commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to Aristotle’s Ethica, V.8. \"Talis fluxus et refluxus gratiarum commanere facit civitatem\", notices Albert the Great, portraying money as an institution that guarantees this flow of mutual reciprocation. Money was then seen as the institution which brought together the different parts of the productive community, whose perpetuation was ensured via the government of the monetary system, allowing for balance among the interests of debtors and creditors, producers and rentiers, merchants and labourers.","PeriodicalId":40401,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2019-002002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Often, contemporary studies maintain that mediaeval thinkers regarded money as a commodity, a metal valuable only according to its intrinsic value; however, a thorough textual examination reveals that they were first and foremost concerned with its institutional dimension as a nomothetic moment of community building. This contribution aims at clarifying the late mediaeval conceptualisation of the nature of money as it emerges from the commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to Aristotle’s Ethica, V.8. "Talis fluxus et refluxus gratiarum commanere facit civitatem", notices Albert the Great, portraying money as an institution that guarantees this flow of mutual reciprocation. Money was then seen as the institution which brought together the different parts of the productive community, whose perpetuation was ensured via the government of the monetary system, allowing for balance among the interests of debtors and creditors, producers and rentiers, merchants and labourers.
金钱作为一种政治制度在阿尔伯特大帝和托马斯·阿奎那对亚里士多德《Nicomachea伦理学》的评论中
通常,当代研究认为,中世纪思想家认为货币是一种商品,一种只根据其内在价值而有价值的金属;然而,彻底的文本检查表明,他们首先关心的是其作为社区建设的nomothetic时刻的制度维度。这一贡献的目的是澄清中世纪晚期对货币本质的概念化,因为它从阿尔伯特大帝和托马斯阿奎那的评论到亚里士多德的伦理学,V.8中出现。阿尔伯特大帝指出,"Talis fluus et refluus gratiarum commanere facit civem ",将金钱描绘成保证这种相互回报流动的一种制度。当时,货币被视为一种制度,它将生产共同体的不同部分聚集在一起,通过货币体系的政府来确保其永久化,从而实现债务人和债权人、生产者和食利者、商人和劳动者之间的利益平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信