Reparative Public Musicology: Empowering and Centering Community Knowledge Production through Counter-Storytelling Practice

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
J. Henry
{"title":"Reparative Public Musicology: Empowering and Centering Community Knowledge Production through Counter-Storytelling Practice","authors":"J. Henry","doi":"10.5406/19452349.40.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent scholarship contesting notions of “legitimate” knowledge in musicological discourse reveals the deeply ingrained and exclusionary structures of white supremacy in the discipline. Notably, musicologists Rachel Mundy and Matthew D. Morrison show how musicology’s grounding in racist biological determinisms profoundly shapes the discipline and its membership and discourses.1 Music scholars Danielle Brown and William Cheng note how the discipline’s epistemologically violent histories and practices inflict emotional and psychological harm upon music scholars of color and their research subjects.2 Many of these same scholars have made explicit calls to dismantle these problematic structures of knowledge production and the broader institutions that support them. I contend that public musicology has the potential to respond meaningfully to these epistemological issues; however, many of the field’s initiatives inadequately seek to promote “the results of recent research and discovery in the field of musicology. . .”3 Accordingly, musicologists most frequently engage the public through preconcert lectures, mainstream broadcasts, popular publications, social media platforms, and other public media. While these initiatives make music histories","PeriodicalId":43462,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN MUSIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN MUSIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/19452349.40.3.02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent scholarship contesting notions of “legitimate” knowledge in musicological discourse reveals the deeply ingrained and exclusionary structures of white supremacy in the discipline. Notably, musicologists Rachel Mundy and Matthew D. Morrison show how musicology’s grounding in racist biological determinisms profoundly shapes the discipline and its membership and discourses.1 Music scholars Danielle Brown and William Cheng note how the discipline’s epistemologically violent histories and practices inflict emotional and psychological harm upon music scholars of color and their research subjects.2 Many of these same scholars have made explicit calls to dismantle these problematic structures of knowledge production and the broader institutions that support them. I contend that public musicology has the potential to respond meaningfully to these epistemological issues; however, many of the field’s initiatives inadequately seek to promote “the results of recent research and discovery in the field of musicology. . .”3 Accordingly, musicologists most frequently engage the public through preconcert lectures, mainstream broadcasts, popular publications, social media platforms, and other public media. While these initiatives make music histories
修复性公共音乐学:通过反叙事实践赋予社区知识生产权力和中心
最近的学术界对音乐学话语中“合法”知识的概念提出了质疑,揭示了该学科中白人至上主义根深蒂固的排斥结构。值得注意的是,音乐学家Rachel Mundy和Matthew D。Morrison展示了音乐学在种族主义生物学决定论中的基础如何深刻地塑造了该学科及其成员和话语。1音乐学者Danielle Brown和William Cheng注意到该学科在认识论上的暴力历史和实践如何对有色人种音乐学者及其研究对象造成情感和心理伤害学者们明确呼吁拆除这些有问题的知识生产结构以及支持它们的更广泛的机构。我认为,公共音乐学有潜力对这些认识论问题做出有意义的回应;然而,该领域的许多举措都未能充分促进“音乐学领域最近的研究和发现成果……”3因此,音乐学家最常通过先入为主的讲座、主流广播、流行出版物、社交媒体平台和其他公共媒体来吸引公众。虽然这些举措创造了音乐历史
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Now in its 28th year, American Music publishes articles on American composers, performers, publishers, institutions, events, and the music industry, as well as book and recording reviews, bibliographies, and discographies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信