I (Won’t) See You in Court Alternative Dispute Resolution for Medical Liability Conflicts: Examples from Europe

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Vera Lúcia Raposo
{"title":"I (Won’t) See You in Court Alternative Dispute Resolution for Medical Liability Conflicts: Examples from Europe","authors":"Vera Lúcia Raposo","doi":"10.54648/erpl2020076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many jurisdictions, courts and the related tort liability rules have failed to adequately address conflicts arising from healthcare delivery that has caused harm. The litigation model – the classic model used to deal with medical liability – must be, if not replaced, at least supplemented by another model, and alternative dispute resolution is best suited to this task. Because conflicts are resolved in a less adversarial environment than a courtroom and led by people with knowledge of both medicine and law, alternative dispute resolution promotes a congenial procedure, is faster and cheaper than traditional litigation and can provide more satisfactory outcomes for all parties. This paper reviews some of the failures of litigation as a means of resolving disputes related to medical liability and considers how alternative dispute resolution methods can address these failures, providing some examples from civil law jurisdictions in Europe.\nalternative dispute resolution, doctor-patient relationship, litigation, medical liability Motsclés: résolution alternative des conflits, relation médecin-patient, contentieux, responsabilité médicale Schlüsselwörter: alternative Streitbeilegung, Arzt-Patient-Beziehung, Gerichtsverfahren, Arzthaftung","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2020076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many jurisdictions, courts and the related tort liability rules have failed to adequately address conflicts arising from healthcare delivery that has caused harm. The litigation model – the classic model used to deal with medical liability – must be, if not replaced, at least supplemented by another model, and alternative dispute resolution is best suited to this task. Because conflicts are resolved in a less adversarial environment than a courtroom and led by people with knowledge of both medicine and law, alternative dispute resolution promotes a congenial procedure, is faster and cheaper than traditional litigation and can provide more satisfactory outcomes for all parties. This paper reviews some of the failures of litigation as a means of resolving disputes related to medical liability and considers how alternative dispute resolution methods can address these failures, providing some examples from civil law jurisdictions in Europe. alternative dispute resolution, doctor-patient relationship, litigation, medical liability Motsclés: résolution alternative des conflits, relation médecin-patient, contentieux, responsabilité médicale Schlüsselwörter: alternative Streitbeilegung, Arzt-Patient-Beziehung, Gerichtsverfahren, Arzthaftung
医疗责任冲突的替代争议解决:来自欧洲的例子
在许多司法管辖区,法院和相关的侵权责任规则未能充分解决因医疗服务提供而产生的造成伤害的冲突。诉讼模式——用于处理医疗责任的经典模式——如果不能被取代,至少必须被另一种模式所补充,而替代性纠纷解决最适合这项任务。由于冲突是在一个比法庭更不具对抗性的环境中解决的,并且由精通医学和法律的人领导,因此替代性纠纷解决可以促进一种和谐的程序,比传统诉讼更快、更便宜,并且可以为各方提供更令人满意的结果。本文回顾了诉讼作为解决医疗责任纠纷手段的一些失败,并考虑了替代性纠纷解决方法如何解决这些失败,提供了欧洲民法管辖区的一些例子,医疗责任Motsclés:résolution alternative des conflicits,relation médecin patient,contentieux,responsabilitémémedical Schlüsselwörter:alternative Streitbeilegung,Arzt patient Beziehung,Gerichtsverfahren,Arzthaftung
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信