Concordance between sites of tumor development in humans and in experimental animals for 111 agents that are carcinogenic to humans.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Daniel Krewski, Jerry M Rice, Michael Bird, Brittany Milton, Brian Collins, Pascale Lajoie, Mélissa Billard, Yann Grosse, Vincent J Cogliano, Jane C Caldwell, Ivan I Rusyn, Christopher J Portier, Ronald L Melnick, Robert A Baan, Julian Little, Jan M Zielinski
{"title":"Concordance between sites of tumor development in humans and in experimental animals for 111 agents that are carcinogenic to humans.","authors":"Daniel Krewski, Jerry M Rice, Michael Bird, Brittany Milton, Brian Collins, Pascale Lajoie, Mélissa Billard, Yann Grosse, Vincent J Cogliano, Jane C Caldwell, Ivan I Rusyn, Christopher J Portier, Ronald L Melnick, Robert A Baan, Julian Little, Jan M Zielinski","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2019.1642586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the inception of the <i>IARC Monographs Programme</i> in the early 1970s, this <i>Programme</i> has developed 119 <i>Monograph</i> Volumes on more than 1000 agents for which there exists some evidence of cancer risk to humans. Of these, 120 agents were found to meet the criteria for classification as <i>carcinogenic to humans</i> (Group 1). Volume 100 of the <i>IARC Monographs</i>, compiled in 2008-2009 and published in 2012, provided a review and update of the 107 Group 1 agents identified as of 2009. These agents were divided into six broad categories: (I) pharmaceuticals; (II) biological agents; (III) arsenic, metals, fibers and dusts; (IV) radiation; (V) personal habits and indoor combustions; and (VI) chemical agents and related occupations. The Group I agents reviewed in Volume 100, as well as five additional Group 1 agents defined in subsequent Volumes of the <i>Monographs</i>, were used to assess the degree of concordance between sites where tumors originate in humans and experimental animals including mice, rats, hamsters, dogs, and non-human primates using an anatomically based tumor nomenclature system, representing 39 tumor sites and 14 organ and tissue systems. This evaluation identified 91 Group 1 agents with <i>sufficient evidence</i> (82 agents) or <i>limited evidence</i> (9 agents) of carcinogenicity in animals. The most common tumors observed in both humans and animals were those of the respiratory system including larynx, lung, and lower respiratory tract. In humans, respiratory system tumors were noted for 31 of the 111 distinct Group 1 carcinogens identified up to and including Volume 109 of the <i>IARC Monographs</i>, comprising predominantly 14 chemical agents and related occupations in category VI; seven arsenic, metals, fibers, and dusts in category III, and five personal habits and indoor combustions in category V. Subsequent to respiratory system tumors, those in lymphoid and hematopoietic tissues (26 agents), the urothelium (18 agents), and the upper aerodigestive tract (16 agents) were most often seen in humans, while tumors in digestive organs (19 agents), skin (18 agents), and connective tissues (17 agents) were frequently seen in animals. Exposures to radiation, particularly X- and γ-radiation, and tobacco smoke were associated with tumors at multiple sites in humans. Although the <i>IARC Monographs</i> did not emphasize tumor site concordance between animals and humans, substantial concordance was detected for several organ and tissue systems, even under the stringent criteria for <i>sufficient evidence</i> of carcinogenicity used by IARC. Of the 60 agents for which at least one tumor site was identified in both humans and animals, 52 (87%) exhibited tumors in at least one of the same organ and tissue systems in humans and animals. It should be noted that some caution is needed in interpreting concordance at sites where sample size is particularly small. Although perfect (100%) concordance was noted for agents that induce tumors of the mesothelium, only two Group 1 agents that met the criteria for inclusion in the concordance analysis caused tumors at this site. Although the present analysis demonstrates good concordance between animals and humans for many, but not all, tumor sites, limitations of available data may result in underestimation of concordance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":"22 1","pages":"203-236"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2019.1642586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the inception of the IARC Monographs Programme in the early 1970s, this Programme has developed 119 Monograph Volumes on more than 1000 agents for which there exists some evidence of cancer risk to humans. Of these, 120 agents were found to meet the criteria for classification as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). Volume 100 of the IARC Monographs, compiled in 2008-2009 and published in 2012, provided a review and update of the 107 Group 1 agents identified as of 2009. These agents were divided into six broad categories: (I) pharmaceuticals; (II) biological agents; (III) arsenic, metals, fibers and dusts; (IV) radiation; (V) personal habits and indoor combustions; and (VI) chemical agents and related occupations. The Group I agents reviewed in Volume 100, as well as five additional Group 1 agents defined in subsequent Volumes of the Monographs, were used to assess the degree of concordance between sites where tumors originate in humans and experimental animals including mice, rats, hamsters, dogs, and non-human primates using an anatomically based tumor nomenclature system, representing 39 tumor sites and 14 organ and tissue systems. This evaluation identified 91 Group 1 agents with sufficient evidence (82 agents) or limited evidence (9 agents) of carcinogenicity in animals. The most common tumors observed in both humans and animals were those of the respiratory system including larynx, lung, and lower respiratory tract. In humans, respiratory system tumors were noted for 31 of the 111 distinct Group 1 carcinogens identified up to and including Volume 109 of the IARC Monographs, comprising predominantly 14 chemical agents and related occupations in category VI; seven arsenic, metals, fibers, and dusts in category III, and five personal habits and indoor combustions in category V. Subsequent to respiratory system tumors, those in lymphoid and hematopoietic tissues (26 agents), the urothelium (18 agents), and the upper aerodigestive tract (16 agents) were most often seen in humans, while tumors in digestive organs (19 agents), skin (18 agents), and connective tissues (17 agents) were frequently seen in animals. Exposures to radiation, particularly X- and γ-radiation, and tobacco smoke were associated with tumors at multiple sites in humans. Although the IARC Monographs did not emphasize tumor site concordance between animals and humans, substantial concordance was detected for several organ and tissue systems, even under the stringent criteria for sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity used by IARC. Of the 60 agents for which at least one tumor site was identified in both humans and animals, 52 (87%) exhibited tumors in at least one of the same organ and tissue systems in humans and animals. It should be noted that some caution is needed in interpreting concordance at sites where sample size is particularly small. Although perfect (100%) concordance was noted for agents that induce tumors of the mesothelium, only two Group 1 agents that met the criteria for inclusion in the concordance analysis caused tumors at this site. Although the present analysis demonstrates good concordance between animals and humans for many, but not all, tumor sites, limitations of available data may result in underestimation of concordance.

111种致癌物在人类和实验动物中肿瘤发生部位的一致性
摘要自20世纪70年代初IARC专著计划成立以来,该计划已开发了119卷关于1000多种药物的专著,有证据表明这些药物对人类有癌症风险。其中,120种药剂被发现符合对人类致癌的标准(第1组)。2008–2009年汇编并于2012年出版的IARC专著第100卷对截至2009年确定的107种第1组制剂进行了审查和更新。这些制剂分为六大类:(I)药物;(II) 生物制剂;(III) 砷、金属、纤维和灰尘;(IV) 辐射;(V) 个人习惯和室内燃烧;以及(VI)化学制剂和相关职业。使用基于解剖学的肿瘤命名系统,使用第100卷中审查的第一组药物以及随后各卷专著中定义的另外五种第一组药物,评估人类和实验动物(包括小鼠、大鼠、仓鼠、狗和非人灵长类动物)肿瘤起源部位之间的一致性程度,代表39个肿瘤部位和14个器官和组织系统。该评估确定了91种具有足够证据(82种制剂)或有限证据(9种制剂)的第1组制剂对动物具有致癌性。在人类和动物身上观察到的最常见的肿瘤是呼吸系统的肿瘤,包括喉、肺和下呼吸道。在人类中,在IARC专著第109卷(包括第109卷)之前确定的111种不同的第1类致癌物中,有31种是呼吸系统肿瘤,主要包括14种化学制剂和VI类相关职业;III类中有7种砷、金属、纤维和灰尘,V类中有5种个人习惯和室内燃烧。继呼吸系统肿瘤之后,淋巴和造血组织(26种药物)、尿路上皮(18种药物)和上气消化道(16种药物)中的肿瘤最常见于人类,而消化器官(19种药物),结缔组织(17种制剂)在动物中常见。暴露于辐射,特别是X射线和γ射线,以及烟草烟雾与人类多个部位的肿瘤有关。尽管IARC专著没有强调动物和人类之间的肿瘤部位一致性,但在几个器官和组织系统中检测到了实质性的一致性,即使在IARC使用的足够致癌证据的严格标准下也是如此。在人类和动物中都鉴定出至少一个肿瘤部位的60种药物中,52种(87%)在人和动物的至少一个相同器官和组织系统中表现出肿瘤。应该注意的是,在样本量特别小的地点解释一致性时需要谨慎。尽管诱导间皮瘤的药物完全一致(100%),但只有两种符合一致性分析标准的第1组药物在该部位引起肿瘤。尽管目前的分析表明,在许多(但不是所有)肿瘤部位,动物和人类之间存在良好的一致性,但现有数据的局限性可能会导致对一致性的低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health. Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews." The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信