Secondary physical education teaching methods course: through the lens of the preservice teachers

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Hodges, Ashley Phelps, Robert Knipe, Brooke Doherty, Jeff Colburn, Xiaofen D. Hamilton
{"title":"Secondary physical education teaching methods course: through the lens of the preservice teachers","authors":"M. Hodges, Ashley Phelps, Robert Knipe, Brooke Doherty, Jeff Colburn, Xiaofen D. Hamilton","doi":"10.1080/25742981.2022.2042340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Public school secondary physical education needs support. One approach in assisting is to improve the next generation of preservice physical education teachers (PPETs). The purpose of the study was to explore PPET secondary physical education training through the secondary teaching methods course offered in two universities in the US. A total of 14 PPETs participated in the study. Qualitative methods were employed through a phenomenological framework. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using constant comparative methods [Kolb (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 83–86]. Two themes emerged: (a) PPETs have a stronghold on management, as they displayed feelings of high importance towards this topic, and (b) preparing for quality instruction when cooperating teachers are not, resulting in PPETs’ questioning the importance of lesson planning. PPETs views on the misalignment of university and district practices are troubling and suggest university and K-12 partnerships to be formed. Future research should examine ways to improve field experiences associated with these courses.","PeriodicalId":36887,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"92 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2022.2042340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public school secondary physical education needs support. One approach in assisting is to improve the next generation of preservice physical education teachers (PPETs). The purpose of the study was to explore PPET secondary physical education training through the secondary teaching methods course offered in two universities in the US. A total of 14 PPETs participated in the study. Qualitative methods were employed through a phenomenological framework. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using constant comparative methods [Kolb (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 83–86]. Two themes emerged: (a) PPETs have a stronghold on management, as they displayed feelings of high importance towards this topic, and (b) preparing for quality instruction when cooperating teachers are not, resulting in PPETs’ questioning the importance of lesson planning. PPETs views on the misalignment of university and district practices are troubling and suggest university and K-12 partnerships to be formed. Future research should examine ways to improve field experiences associated with these courses.
中学体育课程教学方法:通过对职前教师的镜头
公立学校中学体育需要支持。其中一种方法是提高下一代职前体育教师的素质。本研究的目的是通过美国两所大学开设的中学教学方法课程来探讨pet中学体育训练。共有14名宠物参与了这项研究。通过现象学框架采用定性方法。半结构化访谈采用恒定比较法进行分析[Kolb(2012)]。扎根理论与持续比较方法:教育工作者的有效研究策略。教育与政策研究,3(1),83-86。出现了两个主题:(a)宠物在管理方面有一个据点,因为他们对这个主题表现出高度重视的感觉;(b)在合作教师没有为高质量教学做准备的情况下,宠物对课程规划的重要性提出了质疑。PPETs对大学和地区实践不一致的看法令人不安,并建议大学和K-12建立伙伴关系。未来的研究应探讨如何改善与这些课程相关的实地经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信