Gramáticas de lo inaudito as Decolonial Grammars: Notes for a Decolonization of Listening

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
María del Rosario Acosta López
{"title":"Gramáticas de lo inaudito as Decolonial Grammars: Notes for a Decolonization of Listening","authors":"María del Rosario Acosta López","doi":"10.1163/15691640-12341496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper proposes to reflect self-critically on an ongoing research project entitled “Grammars of listening,” which started as a philosophical approach to the question of listening at the site of trauma and the challenges this kind of listening poses to our conceptions of memory and history, and has recently shifted to asking about the possible limitations to such a reflection when confronted with a decolonial perspective on temporality. I start by presenting a conceptual background for my inquiry, and asking what kind of listening is required when trauma is considered as a colonizing form of violence – that is, when its effects are not only understood as an assault on life but on the conditions of production of sense that make life legible. Following the kind of challenges that such an understanding of trauma poses to the responsibility to listen to its testimony, the paper moves on to propose that only a decolonial approach to listening can truly do justice to the task of rendering testimonies of traumatic violence audible. By decolonizing the frameworks that organize and determine colonial and colonizing distributions of sense, I propose that grammars of lo inaudito understood as decolonial grammars contribute to resisting and disorganizing the criteria for legibility and audibility that colonizing forms of violence not only institute but constantly actualize in their attempt to perpetuate their silencing power.1","PeriodicalId":44158,"journal":{"name":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper proposes to reflect self-critically on an ongoing research project entitled “Grammars of listening,” which started as a philosophical approach to the question of listening at the site of trauma and the challenges this kind of listening poses to our conceptions of memory and history, and has recently shifted to asking about the possible limitations to such a reflection when confronted with a decolonial perspective on temporality. I start by presenting a conceptual background for my inquiry, and asking what kind of listening is required when trauma is considered as a colonizing form of violence – that is, when its effects are not only understood as an assault on life but on the conditions of production of sense that make life legible. Following the kind of challenges that such an understanding of trauma poses to the responsibility to listen to its testimony, the paper moves on to propose that only a decolonial approach to listening can truly do justice to the task of rendering testimonies of traumatic violence audible. By decolonizing the frameworks that organize and determine colonial and colonizing distributions of sense, I propose that grammars of lo inaudito understood as decolonial grammars contribute to resisting and disorganizing the criteria for legibility and audibility that colonizing forms of violence not only institute but constantly actualize in their attempt to perpetuate their silencing power.1
Gramáticas de loinaudito as非殖民化语法:非殖民化听力笔记
本文建议对一个正在进行的名为“倾听的语法”的研究项目进行自我批判的反思,该项目最初是作为一种哲学方法来解决在创伤现场倾听的问题,以及这种倾听对我们的记忆和历史概念构成的挑战,最近,当面对非殖民化的临时性观点时,它转向了询问这种反思的可能局限性。我首先为我的调查提供了一个概念背景,并提出了当创伤被认为是一种殖民形式的暴力时,也就是说,当它的影响不仅被理解为对生命的攻击,而且被理解为对使生命清晰的感觉的产生条件的攻击时,需要什么样的倾听。鉴于这种对创伤的理解给倾听其证词的责任带来的挑战,本文继续提出,只有一种非殖民化的倾听方法才能真正公正地完成使创伤性暴力的证词能够被听到的任务。通过将组织和决定殖民和殖民意义分布的框架去殖民化,我认为,被理解为非殖民化语法的听不到语法有助于抵抗和瓦解易读性和可听性的标准,殖民形式的暴力不仅建立了这些标准,而且不断地实现了这些标准,以使其沉默的权力永久化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Research in Phenomenology deals with phenomenological philosophy in a broad sense, including original phenomenological research, critical and interpretative studies of major phenomenological thinkers, studies relating phenomenological philosophy to other disciplines, and historical studies of special relevance to phenomenological philosophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信