Predictive Factors, Treatment, and Outcomes of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Peritonitis in Malaysian Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Single-Center Study

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
S. Y. Lau, B. Bee, H. Wong, M. Omar, N. Bahari
{"title":"Predictive Factors, Treatment, and Outcomes of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Peritonitis in Malaysian Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Single-Center Study","authors":"S. Y. Lau, B. Bee, H. Wong, M. Omar, N. Bahari","doi":"10.1155/2022/8985178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently isolated in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis with a high rate of relapse and repeat peritonitis after initial response to antimicrobials. The optimal treatment regimen for CoNS peritonitis remains debatable. Hence, this study aimed to describe the clinical and microbiologic characteristics of CoNS peritonitis in a PD center and determine predictive factors influencing the outcomes. Methods All cases of CoNS peritonitis in Selayang Hospital between 2011 and 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 906 episodes of peritonitis were recorded; 140 episodes (15%) in 98 patients were caused by CoNS. The oxacillin and gentamicin resistance rates were 47% and 46%, respectively. The overall primary response rate was 90%, and the complete cure rate was 79%. Patients with concomitant exit-site infection (odds ratio (OR) 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.40, P < 0.01) and history of recent systemic antibiotic use (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.82, P=0.04) were less likely to achieve primary response. CoNS episodes that were treated with beta-lactam-based or vancomycin-based therapy had a similar primary response rate and complete cure rate. The rates of relapse and repeat were 12% and 16%, respectively. Relapsed episodes (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.97, P=0.04) had a significantly lower complete cure rate than the first episodes. Conclusion Relapsed CoNS peritonitis was common and was associated with worse outcomes than the first episode of CoNS peritonitis. Oxacillin resistance was common, but the treatment outcome remained favourable when a beta-lactam-based regimen was used as empirical therapy.","PeriodicalId":14177,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8985178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently isolated in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis with a high rate of relapse and repeat peritonitis after initial response to antimicrobials. The optimal treatment regimen for CoNS peritonitis remains debatable. Hence, this study aimed to describe the clinical and microbiologic characteristics of CoNS peritonitis in a PD center and determine predictive factors influencing the outcomes. Methods All cases of CoNS peritonitis in Selayang Hospital between 2011 and 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 906 episodes of peritonitis were recorded; 140 episodes (15%) in 98 patients were caused by CoNS. The oxacillin and gentamicin resistance rates were 47% and 46%, respectively. The overall primary response rate was 90%, and the complete cure rate was 79%. Patients with concomitant exit-site infection (odds ratio (OR) 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.40, P < 0.01) and history of recent systemic antibiotic use (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.82, P=0.04) were less likely to achieve primary response. CoNS episodes that were treated with beta-lactam-based or vancomycin-based therapy had a similar primary response rate and complete cure rate. The rates of relapse and repeat were 12% and 16%, respectively. Relapsed episodes (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.97, P=0.04) had a significantly lower complete cure rate than the first episodes. Conclusion Relapsed CoNS peritonitis was common and was associated with worse outcomes than the first episode of CoNS peritonitis. Oxacillin resistance was common, but the treatment outcome remained favourable when a beta-lactam-based regimen was used as empirical therapy.
马来西亚腹膜透析患者凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌性腹膜炎的预测因素、治疗和转归:一项单中心研究
目的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)在腹膜透析(PD)相关腹膜炎中经常被分离,在对抗菌药物最初反应后复发和重复腹膜炎的几率很高。CoNS腹膜炎的最佳治疗方案仍有争议。因此,本研究旨在描述PD中心CoNS腹膜炎的临床和微生物学特征,并确定影响结果的预测因素。方法回顾性分析2011年至2019年塞拉阳医院收治的所有CoNS型腹膜炎病例。结果共发生腹膜炎906例;98例患者中140例(15%)由CoNS引起。苯唑西林和庆大霉素的耐药率分别为47%和46%。总的初级有效率为90%,完全治愈率为79%。伴有出口部位感染(比值比(OR)0.06,95%置信区间(CI)0.01至0.40,P<0.01)和近期系统性抗生素使用史(OR 0.04,95%CI 0.01至0.82,P=0.04)的患者不太可能获得主要反应。用β-内酰胺类或万古霉素类治疗的CoNS发作具有相似的主要缓解率和完全治愈率。复发率和复发率分别为12%和16%。复发性发作(OR 0.35,95%CI 0.13-0.97,P=0.04)的完全治愈率明显低于首次发作。结论复发性CoNS腹膜炎是常见的,其预后比首次发作的CoNS腹膜炎差。奥西林耐药性是常见的,但当使用基于β-内酰胺的方案作为经验治疗时,治疗结果仍然有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Nephrology
International Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nephrology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of kidney diseases and associated disorders. The journal welcomes submissions related to cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pathophysiology of renal disease and progression, clinical nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信