Building Community-Engaged Multidisciplinary Partnerships to Improve Medication Management in Elderly Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
I. Poon, Felicia Skelton, Lena R. Bean, Dominique Guinn, Terica L Jemerson, Ngozi D. Mbue, Creaque V Charles, U. A. Ndefo
{"title":"Building Community-Engaged Multidisciplinary Partnerships to Improve Medication Management in Elderly Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.","authors":"I. Poon, Felicia Skelton, Lena R. Bean, Dominique Guinn, Terica L Jemerson, Ngozi D. Mbue, Creaque V Charles, U. A. Ndefo","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nMany studies in preventing adverse drug events have been researcher-driven, yet few have engaged patients in the development of a project. This project aims to engage minority elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions in the development of research questions and strategies to improve medication safety.\n\n\nMethods\nElderly patients (≥65 years old) who were prescribed 7 or more chronic medications were recruited through a university-based aging resource network in a historically African American community in Houston, Texas. Patients and a caregiver participated in a multidisciplinary workgroup comprised of a physician, pharmacists, a nurse, health educators, and a social worker. Patients were engaged by utilizing the 4 patient-centered outcomes research engagement principles. The workgroup created a strategic plan, completed an environmental scan, identified research problems, and reviewed current evidence-based approaches in the literature. Workgroup findings were presented to a broader audience within a community town hall setting, and input was collected from a community-wide survey.\n\n\nResults\nFrom April 2018 to July 2018, 3 patients and 1 caregiver participated in 5 multidisciplinary workgroup meetings. A total of 74 seniors attended the town hall meeting, and 69 completed the surveys. The most common drug-related problems among survey participants were doubts about drug advertisements (79%) and drug interactions (70%). Most participants (88%) were more comfortable in receiving face-to-face counseling compared to an app or virtual visits. Findings aided in developing 3 grant proposals.\n\n\nConclusions\nThis narrative provides a roadmap for conducting multidisciplinary, patient-centered participatory research to refine research strategies in minimizing drug-related problems.","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"8 2 1","pages":"113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Many studies in preventing adverse drug events have been researcher-driven, yet few have engaged patients in the development of a project. This project aims to engage minority elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions in the development of research questions and strategies to improve medication safety. Methods Elderly patients (≥65 years old) who were prescribed 7 or more chronic medications were recruited through a university-based aging resource network in a historically African American community in Houston, Texas. Patients and a caregiver participated in a multidisciplinary workgroup comprised of a physician, pharmacists, a nurse, health educators, and a social worker. Patients were engaged by utilizing the 4 patient-centered outcomes research engagement principles. The workgroup created a strategic plan, completed an environmental scan, identified research problems, and reviewed current evidence-based approaches in the literature. Workgroup findings were presented to a broader audience within a community town hall setting, and input was collected from a community-wide survey. Results From April 2018 to July 2018, 3 patients and 1 caregiver participated in 5 multidisciplinary workgroup meetings. A total of 74 seniors attended the town hall meeting, and 69 completed the surveys. The most common drug-related problems among survey participants were doubts about drug advertisements (79%) and drug interactions (70%). Most participants (88%) were more comfortable in receiving face-to-face counseling compared to an app or virtual visits. Findings aided in developing 3 grant proposals. Conclusions This narrative provides a roadmap for conducting multidisciplinary, patient-centered participatory research to refine research strategies in minimizing drug-related problems.
建立社区参与的多学科合作伙伴关系以改善老年多重慢性病患者的用药管理。
目的许多预防药物不良事件的研究都是由研究人员推动的,但很少有患者参与项目的开发。该项目旨在让患有多种慢性病的少数民族老年患者参与研究问题和策略的制定,以提高药物安全性。方法通过德克萨斯州休斯顿一个历史悠久的非裔美国人社区的大学老龄资源网络招募接受7种或7种以上慢性药物治疗的老年患者(≥65岁)。患者和护理人员参加了一个由医生、药剂师、护士、健康教育工作者和社会工作者组成的多学科工作组。采用4项以患者为中心的结果研究参与原则对患者进行参与。该工作组制定了一项战略计划,完成了环境扫描,确定了研究问题,并审查了文献中当前的循证方法。工作组的调查结果在社区市政厅环境中向更广泛的受众介绍,并从社区范围的调查中收集意见。结果2018年4月至2018年7月,3名患者和1名护理人员参加了5次多学科工作组会议。共有74名老年人参加了市政厅会议,69人完成了调查。调查参与者中最常见的毒品相关问题是对药物广告(79%)和药物相互作用(70%)的怀疑。与应用程序或虚拟访问相比,大多数参与者(88%)更愿意接受面对面的咨询。调查结果有助于制定3项赠款提案。结论该叙述为开展多学科、以患者为中心的参与性研究提供了路线图,以完善研究策略,最大限度地减少毒品相关问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信