Empirical validation of co-simulation models for adaptive building envelopes

Q1 Engineering
E. Borkowski, Alessandra Luna Navarro, M. Michael, M. Overend, Dimitrios Rova, R. Raslan
{"title":"Empirical validation of co-simulation models for adaptive building envelopes","authors":"E. Borkowski, Alessandra Luna Navarro, M. Michael, M. Overend, Dimitrios Rova, R. Raslan","doi":"10.47982/jfde.2022.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thermal performance of adaptive building envelopes can be evaluated using building performance simulation tools. Simulation capabilities and accuracy in predicting the dynamic behaviour of adaptive building envelopes can be enhanced through co-simulation. However, it is unclear how accurately co-simulation can predict the performance of adaptive building envelopes and how the accuracy of adaptive building envelope models created in co-simulation setups can be assessed and validated. Therefore, this study presents new evidence on the empirical validation of co-simulation setups for adaptive building envelopes by establishing an assessment framework to determine the extent to which they can accurately represent the real world. The framework was applied to a case study to validate a co-simulation setup for a blind automation system using monitored data from MATELab, a full-scale outdoor test facility with realistic indoor and outdoor conditions. The validation of the co-simulation model of MATELab resulted in a median CV-RMSE index, a measure of model accuracy, of 5.9%. This indicates that the simulated data points have a small variance relative to the measured data points, showing a good model fit. In the future, modellers from the façade community can use the assessment framework for their co-simulation setups.","PeriodicalId":37451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2022.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The thermal performance of adaptive building envelopes can be evaluated using building performance simulation tools. Simulation capabilities and accuracy in predicting the dynamic behaviour of adaptive building envelopes can be enhanced through co-simulation. However, it is unclear how accurately co-simulation can predict the performance of adaptive building envelopes and how the accuracy of adaptive building envelope models created in co-simulation setups can be assessed and validated. Therefore, this study presents new evidence on the empirical validation of co-simulation setups for adaptive building envelopes by establishing an assessment framework to determine the extent to which they can accurately represent the real world. The framework was applied to a case study to validate a co-simulation setup for a blind automation system using monitored data from MATELab, a full-scale outdoor test facility with realistic indoor and outdoor conditions. The validation of the co-simulation model of MATELab resulted in a median CV-RMSE index, a measure of model accuracy, of 5.9%. This indicates that the simulated data points have a small variance relative to the measured data points, showing a good model fit. In the future, modellers from the façade community can use the assessment framework for their co-simulation setups.
自适应建筑围护结构联合仿真模型的实证验证
自适应建筑围护结构的热性能可以使用建筑性能模拟工具进行评估。通过协同仿真,可以增强模拟能力和预测自适应建筑围护结构动态行为的准确性。然而,目前尚不清楚联合仿真可以多准确地预测自适应建筑围护结构的性能,以及如何评估和验证在联合仿真设置中创建的自适应建筑围护模型的准确性。因此,本研究通过建立一个评估框架来确定自适应建筑围护结构的联合模拟设置在多大程度上能够准确地代表真实世界,从而为自适应建筑围护的联合模拟设备的实证验证提供了新的证据。该框架被应用于一个案例研究,以使用MATELab的监测数据验证盲人自动化系统的联合模拟设置,MATELab是一个具有真实室内和室外条件的全尺寸室外测试设施。MATELab联合模拟模型的验证结果显示,CV-RMSE指数中值为5.9%,这是衡量模型准确性的指标。这表明模拟数据点相对于测量数据点的方差较小,显示出良好的模型拟合性。未来,来自立面社区的建模人员可以使用评估框架进行共同模拟设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Facade Design and Engineering presents new research results and new proven practice in the field of facade design and engineering. The goal is to improve building technologies, as well as process management and architectural design. This journal is a valuable resource for professionals and academics involved in the design and engineering of building envelopes, including the following disciplines: Architecture Façade Engineering Climate Design Building Services Integration Building Physics Façade Design and Construction Management Novel Material Applications. The journal will be directed at the scientific community, but it will also feature papers that focus on the dissemination of science into practice and industrial innovations. In this way, readers explore the interaction between scientific developments, technical considerations and management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信