What Counts as “Success” in Speculative and Anticipatory Ethics? Lessons from the Advent of Germline Gene Editing

IF 1.1 4区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2019-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s11569-019-00350-7

Ari Schick

引用次数: 3

查看原文本刊更多论文

在思辨和预期伦理学中，什么算是“成功”?从生殖系基因编辑的出现中吸取的教训

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nanoethics HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： NanoEthics: Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale will focus on the philosophically and scientifically rigorous examination of the ethical and societal considerations and the public and policy concerns inherent in nanotechnology research and development. These issues include both individual and societal problems, and include individual health, wellbeing and human enhancement, human integrity and autonomy, distribution of the costs and benefits, threats to culture and tradition and to political and economic stability. Additionally there are meta-issues including the neutrality or otherwise of technology, designing technology in a value-sensitive way, and the control of scientific research.