Does the objective measurement of muscle strength improve the detection of postoperative residual muscle weakness?

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Durga Padmaja, Geetha Singam, Rabbani Tappa, Krishnarao Maremanda, Nitesh Kabra, Anupama Barada
{"title":"Does the objective measurement of muscle strength improve the detection of postoperative residual muscle weakness?","authors":"Durga Padmaja, Geetha Singam, Rabbani Tappa, Krishnarao Maremanda, Nitesh Kabra, Anupama Barada","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_186_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The postoperative residual neuromuscular block (PRNB) has a significant impact on patient safety and well-being, but continues to remain underestimated. Objective evaluation of handgrip strength using a force dynamometer can be useful to identify postoperative muscle weakness.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-two American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II patients who received general anesthesia were included. Patients were extubated after the train-of-four (TOR) ratio (TOFR) was >0.90 and the clinical criteria for motor power recovery were judged as adequate. The measurements of handgrip strength and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were obtained at baseline, 15 min after extubation, and 1, 2, and 4 h postoperatively. The incidence of significant decline from baseline (>25%) was determined. The correlation between handgrip strength and PEFR was assessed using Spearman correlation. The time to return to baseline for muscle grip strength and PEFR was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A <i>P</i> value of 0.05 was considered significant for all tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of the significant decline in handgrip strength from baseline was 100% at 15 and 60 min, 76% at 2 h, and 9.4% at 4 h. There was a strong correlation between muscle grip strength and PEFR (0.89, <i>P</i> < 0.001). None of the patients exhibited the potential complications of PRNB. (PRMB in abstract. It should be uniform) The mean time to return to the baseline value of muscle grip strength was 3.8 h (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-3.9), and the mean time to return to baseline for PEFR was 3.2 h (95% CI 2.9-3.4 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Objective assessment of muscle grip strength using a force dynamometer has the potential to be a new objective metric to monitor postoperative muscle weakness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_186_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The postoperative residual neuromuscular block (PRNB) has a significant impact on patient safety and well-being, but continues to remain underestimated. Objective evaluation of handgrip strength using a force dynamometer can be useful to identify postoperative muscle weakness.

Material and methods: Thirty-two American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II patients who received general anesthesia were included. Patients were extubated after the train-of-four (TOR) ratio (TOFR) was >0.90 and the clinical criteria for motor power recovery were judged as adequate. The measurements of handgrip strength and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were obtained at baseline, 15 min after extubation, and 1, 2, and 4 h postoperatively. The incidence of significant decline from baseline (>25%) was determined. The correlation between handgrip strength and PEFR was assessed using Spearman correlation. The time to return to baseline for muscle grip strength and PEFR was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A P value of 0.05 was considered significant for all tests.

Results: The incidence of the significant decline in handgrip strength from baseline was 100% at 15 and 60 min, 76% at 2 h, and 9.4% at 4 h. There was a strong correlation between muscle grip strength and PEFR (0.89, P < 0.001). None of the patients exhibited the potential complications of PRNB. (PRMB in abstract. It should be uniform) The mean time to return to the baseline value of muscle grip strength was 3.8 h (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-3.9), and the mean time to return to baseline for PEFR was 3.2 h (95% CI 2.9-3.4 h).

Conclusion: Objective assessment of muscle grip strength using a force dynamometer has the potential to be a new objective metric to monitor postoperative muscle weakness.

肌肉力量的客观测量是否能提高术后残余肌肉无力的检测?
背景和目的:术后残余神经肌肉阻滞(PRNB)对患者的安全和福祉有重大影响,但仍被低估。使用测力计对手握强度进行客观评估有助于识别术后肌无力:纳入 32 名接受全身麻醉的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I 级和 II 级患者。患者在四次训练(TOR)比值(TOFR)大于 0.90 且运动能力恢复的临床标准被判定为充分后拔管。分别在基线、拔管后 15 分钟、术后 1、2 和 4 小时测量手握力和呼气峰流速(PEFR)。测定了与基线相比明显下降(>25%)的发生率。使用斯皮尔曼相关性评估了手握力和 PEFR 之间的相关性。采用卡普兰-米尔生存分析法对肌肉握力和 PEFR 恢复到基线的时间进行分析。所有测试的 P 值均以 0.05 为显著:15分钟和60分钟时,手握力从基线明显下降的发生率为100%,2小时时为76%,4小时时为9.4%。没有一名患者出现 PRNB 的潜在并发症。(肌肉握力恢复到基线值的平均时间为 3.8 小时(95% 置信区间 [CI] 3.6-3.9),PEFR 恢复到基线值的平均时间为 3.2 小时(95% 置信区间 [CI] 2.9-3.4 小时):结论:使用测力计客观评估肌肉握力有可能成为监测术后肌无力的新的客观指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信