Understanding the Contribution of Visual Methods to Early Childhood Research: A Cross-Cultural Investigation

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joseph S. Agbenyega, Sunanta Klibthong
{"title":"Understanding the Contribution of Visual Methods to Early Childhood Research: A Cross-Cultural Investigation","authors":"Joseph S. Agbenyega, Sunanta Klibthong","doi":"10.52634/MIER/2015/V5/I1/1503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in education has previously been dominated by what Law (2007) terms the “hygienic forms” (p. 33). Hygienic forms apply to positivistic quantitative traditions which claim supremacy over other forms of knowing. In this methodological paper we report on a phenomenon auto-driven visual elicitation approach of an on going research which attempts to make sense of how children (3-5 year olds) in cross-cultural settings understand risk and safety situations in their settings. We reflect on the concern for contextual reflexivity, emanating from the notion that research activity in early childhood education is “in danger of succumbing to political ideology and methodological fashion” (Prosser & Loxley, 2007, p. 1). We argue that research into early childhood education needs to acknowledge the implicit tensions between conventional empirical research and the politics of research methodology and that researchers cannot bring to the fore everything that is there to be known about child development and learning through orthodox mechanistic means. There are quotidian aspects of children's experiences, development and learning which can best be captured by visual methods that combine other approaches like interviews and observations. The paper concludes with some reflections on the ethical dilemmas and validity issues that confront the researcher when the visual and digital are used across cultures with children.","PeriodicalId":52024,"journal":{"name":"MIER-Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIER-Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52634/MIER/2015/V5/I1/1503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research in education has previously been dominated by what Law (2007) terms the “hygienic forms” (p. 33). Hygienic forms apply to positivistic quantitative traditions which claim supremacy over other forms of knowing. In this methodological paper we report on a phenomenon auto-driven visual elicitation approach of an on going research which attempts to make sense of how children (3-5 year olds) in cross-cultural settings understand risk and safety situations in their settings. We reflect on the concern for contextual reflexivity, emanating from the notion that research activity in early childhood education is “in danger of succumbing to political ideology and methodological fashion” (Prosser & Loxley, 2007, p. 1). We argue that research into early childhood education needs to acknowledge the implicit tensions between conventional empirical research and the politics of research methodology and that researchers cannot bring to the fore everything that is there to be known about child development and learning through orthodox mechanistic means. There are quotidian aspects of children's experiences, development and learning which can best be captured by visual methods that combine other approaches like interviews and observations. The paper concludes with some reflections on the ethical dilemmas and validity issues that confront the researcher when the visual and digital are used across cultures with children.
理解视觉方法对幼儿研究的贡献:一项跨文化调查
此前,教育研究一直以Law(2007)所称的“卫生形式”为主(第33页)。卫生形式适用于实证主义的数量传统,这些传统声称凌驾于其他形式的认识之上。在这篇方法论论文中,我们报道了一项正在进行的研究的现象自动驱动的视觉启发方法,该方法试图弄清楚跨文化环境中的儿童(3-5岁)如何理解他们环境中的风险和安全情况。我们反思了对情境反射性的关注,这种关注源于幼儿教育中的研究活动“有屈服于政治意识形态和方法论时尚的危险”(Prosser和Loxley,2007,第1页)。我们认为,对幼儿教育的研究需要认识到传统实证研究与研究方法论政治之间的隐含紧张关系,研究人员不能通过正统的机械手段将关于儿童发展和学习的一切都凸显出来。儿童的经历、发展和学习有一些日常方面,最好通过结合采访和观察等其他方法的视觉方法来捕捉。本文最后对研究人员在儿童跨文化使用视觉和数字时面临的道德困境和有效性问题进行了一些思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信