Mental and general health at the edges of owner occupation

IF 1.5 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
N. T. K. Truong, Susan J. Smith, G. Wood, W. Clark, W. Lisowski, Rachel Ong ViforJ
{"title":"Mental and general health at the edges of owner occupation","authors":"N. T. K. Truong, Susan J. Smith, G. Wood, W. Clark, W. Lisowski, Rachel Ong ViforJ","doi":"10.1108/ijhma-12-2022-0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to consider one test of a well-functioning housing system – its impact on wellbeing. Exploring one indicator of this, this study aims to track changes in mental and general health across a mix of tenure transitions and financial transactions in three jurisdictions: Australia, the UK and the USA.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing matched variables from three national panel surveys (Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia, British Household Panel Survey/Understanding Society and Panel Study of Income Dynamics) over 17 years (2000–2017) to capture the sweep of the most recent housing cycle, this study adopts a difference-in-difference random-effects model specification to estimate the mental and general health effects of tenure change and borrowing behaviours.\n\n\nFindings\nThere is an enduring health premium associated with unmortgaged owner-occupation. Mortgage debt detracts from this, as does the prospect of dropping out of ownership and into renting. A previously observed post-exit recovery in mental health – a debt-relief effect – is not present in the longer run. In fact, in some circumstances, both mental and general health deficits are amplified, even among those who eventually regain homeownership. Though there are cross-country differences, the similarities across these financialised housing systems are more striking.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe well-being premium traditionally associated with owner occupation is under threat at the edges of the sector in all three jurisdictions. In this, there is cross-national convergence. There may therefore be scope to introduce policies to better support households at the edges of ownership that work across the board for debt-funded ownership-centred housing systems.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper extends the duration of a previous analysis of the impact of tenure transitions and financial transactions on well-being at the edges of ownership in the UK and Australia. The authors now track households over nearly two decades from the start of the millennium into a lengthy (post-global financial crisis) era of declining housing affordability. This study adds to the reach of the earlier study by adding a general health variable and a third jurisdiction, the USA.\n","PeriodicalId":14136,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhma-12-2022-0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider one test of a well-functioning housing system – its impact on wellbeing. Exploring one indicator of this, this study aims to track changes in mental and general health across a mix of tenure transitions and financial transactions in three jurisdictions: Australia, the UK and the USA. Design/methodology/approach Using matched variables from three national panel surveys (Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia, British Household Panel Survey/Understanding Society and Panel Study of Income Dynamics) over 17 years (2000–2017) to capture the sweep of the most recent housing cycle, this study adopts a difference-in-difference random-effects model specification to estimate the mental and general health effects of tenure change and borrowing behaviours. Findings There is an enduring health premium associated with unmortgaged owner-occupation. Mortgage debt detracts from this, as does the prospect of dropping out of ownership and into renting. A previously observed post-exit recovery in mental health – a debt-relief effect – is not present in the longer run. In fact, in some circumstances, both mental and general health deficits are amplified, even among those who eventually regain homeownership. Though there are cross-country differences, the similarities across these financialised housing systems are more striking. Practical implications The well-being premium traditionally associated with owner occupation is under threat at the edges of the sector in all three jurisdictions. In this, there is cross-national convergence. There may therefore be scope to introduce policies to better support households at the edges of ownership that work across the board for debt-funded ownership-centred housing systems. Originality/value This paper extends the duration of a previous analysis of the impact of tenure transitions and financial transactions on well-being at the edges of ownership in the UK and Australia. The authors now track households over nearly two decades from the start of the millennium into a lengthy (post-global financial crisis) era of declining housing affordability. This study adds to the reach of the earlier study by adding a general health variable and a third jurisdiction, the USA.
业主职业边缘的心理和一般健康
目的本文的目的是考虑一个运行良好的住房系统的一个测试——它对幸福感的影响。本研究探讨了这方面的一个指标,旨在跟踪三个司法管辖区的任期过渡和金融交易的心理和总体健康变化:澳大利亚,英国和美国。设计/方法/方法使用三项全国性小组调查(澳大利亚的家庭、收入和劳动力动态、英国家庭小组调查/了解社会和收入动态小组研究)中的匹配变量 年(2000-2017),为了捕捉最近住房周期的影响,本研究采用了差异随机效应模型规范来估计保有权变更和借贷行为对心理和总体健康的影响。发现与未抵押的业主职业相关的是持久的健康溢价。抵押贷款债务和放弃所有权转而租房的前景都会影响这一点。以前观察到的离职后心理健康的恢复——债务减免效应——从长远来看并不存在。事实上,在某些情况下,心理和总体健康缺陷都会加剧,甚至在那些最终重新拥有住房的人中也是如此。尽管存在跨国差异,但这些金融化住房系统之间的相似之处更为显著。实际含义传统上与业主职业相关的福利溢价在所有三个司法管辖区的行业边缘都受到威胁。在这方面,存在着跨国家的趋同。因此,可能有出台政策的余地,以更好地支持处于所有权边缘的家庭,这些政策全面适用于债务资助的以所有权为中心的住房系统。原创性/价值本文延长了之前对英国和澳大利亚所有权边缘的保有权转换和金融交易对幸福感影响的分析的持续时间。作者现在追踪了从千禧年开始到住房负担能力下降的漫长(后全球金融危机)时代近20年的家庭情况。这项研究增加了一个一般健康变量和第三个司法管辖区美国,从而扩大了早期研究的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
29.40%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信