Changing the Grammar of Schooling: An Appraisal and a Research Agenda

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jal Mehta, Amanda Datnow
{"title":"Changing the Grammar of Schooling: An Appraisal and a Research Agenda","authors":"Jal Mehta, Amanda Datnow","doi":"10.1086/709960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1994 and 1995, David Tyack, William Tobin, and Larry Cuban (Tyack and Cuban 1995; Tyack andTobin 1994) coined the term “grammar of schooling” to characterize the long-lasting and largely unchanging core elements of schooling. These elements include batch processing of students, separation of classes by academic discipline, age-graded classrooms, teaching as transmission, leveling and tracking, and schooling as a mechanism for sorting students by perceived ability. In recent years, however, there has been a range of efforts that in different ways try to move us away from the century-old grammar of schooling. These include personalized learning, blended schools, competency-based schooling, deeper learning, community-infused and social justice–oriented schools, and many more. Although these developments have been covered in the press, they have not yet been the subject of much serious research that helps us understand how these innovations develop and sustain over time.Most research, both quantitative and qualitative, is conducted within the existing grammar of schooling. We seek to understand what produces achievement gaps among students (Duncan and Murnane 2011; Jencks and Phillips 1998), why schools ask students to suppress rather than reveal their cultural identities (Valenzuela 1999), and why school","PeriodicalId":47629,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education","volume":"126 1","pages":"491 - 498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709960","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In 1994 and 1995, David Tyack, William Tobin, and Larry Cuban (Tyack and Cuban 1995; Tyack andTobin 1994) coined the term “grammar of schooling” to characterize the long-lasting and largely unchanging core elements of schooling. These elements include batch processing of students, separation of classes by academic discipline, age-graded classrooms, teaching as transmission, leveling and tracking, and schooling as a mechanism for sorting students by perceived ability. In recent years, however, there has been a range of efforts that in different ways try to move us away from the century-old grammar of schooling. These include personalized learning, blended schools, competency-based schooling, deeper learning, community-infused and social justice–oriented schools, and many more. Although these developments have been covered in the press, they have not yet been the subject of much serious research that helps us understand how these innovations develop and sustain over time.Most research, both quantitative and qualitative, is conducted within the existing grammar of schooling. We seek to understand what produces achievement gaps among students (Duncan and Murnane 2011; Jencks and Phillips 1998), why schools ask students to suppress rather than reveal their cultural identities (Valenzuela 1999), and why school
改变学校语法:评价与研究议程
1994年和1995年,大卫·提亚克、威廉·托宾和拉里·库班(提亚克和库班1995;Tyack和tobin(1994)创造了“学校教育语法”一词来描述学校教育的持久和基本不变的核心要素。这些要素包括分批处理学生,按学科分类班级,按年龄分级教室,教学作为传递,水平和跟踪,以及学校作为一种根据感知能力分类学生的机制。然而,近年来,人们做出了一系列努力,以不同的方式试图让我们摆脱已有百年历史的学校语法。这些包括个性化学习、混合式学校、基于能力的学校、深度学习、社区融入和社会正义导向的学校等等。虽然这些发展已经被媒体报道过,但它们还没有成为很多严肃研究的主题,这些研究可以帮助我们理解这些创新是如何随着时间的推移而发展和维持的。大多数研究,无论是定量的还是定性的,都是在现有的学校教育语法范围内进行的。我们试图理解是什么导致了学生之间的成绩差距(Duncan and Murnane 2011;Jencks和Phillips 1998),为什么学校要求学生压抑而不是揭示他们的文化认同(Valenzuela 1999),以及为什么学校
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Education
American Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Founded as School Review in 1893, the American Journal of Education acquired its present name in November 1979. The Journal seeks to bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of educational scholarship, and to encourage a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. To achieve that goal, papers are published that present research, theoretical statements, philosophical arguments, critical syntheses of a field of educational inquiry, and integrations of educational scholarship, policy, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信