Who are macro-community members: an answer from the viewpoint of Confucianism

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
H. Lo
{"title":"Who are macro-community members: an answer from the viewpoint of Confucianism","authors":"H. Lo","doi":"10.1108/sc-01-2020-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to present and discuss the findings from a qualitative study of victim-offender mediation meetings in two non-government organisations in Hong Kong between January 2015 and February 2016. It argues that mediators in Hong Kong have a unique interpretation of the criteria for someone to be considered a “macro-community member”. Confucian relational ethics emphasises that everyone lives in a personal nexus and wrongdoings will disturb this nexus. In this specific context, therefore, mediators feel that reconciliation and reparation should be dealt with by the people in the offender’s network while the involvement of unknown macro-community members is discouraged.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe semi-structured interview was adopted for use in this study, and an interview schedule with 12 open-ended questions was prepared as a guideline for conducting the interviews.\n\n\nFindings\nMediators in Hong Kong have a unique interpretation of the criteria for someone to be considered a “macro-community member” Confucian relational ethics emphasises that everyone lives in a personal nexus and wrongdoings will disturb this nexus. Reconciliation and reparation should be dealt with by the people in the network, and the involvement of macro-community members will certainly disturb this network.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study was conducted by the author between January 2015 and February 2016 for the purpose of obtaining a doctorate. The paper has neither been published previously nor is it under review for publication in any other journal at this time.\n","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":"19 1","pages":"131-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/sc-01-2020-0001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-01-2020-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present and discuss the findings from a qualitative study of victim-offender mediation meetings in two non-government organisations in Hong Kong between January 2015 and February 2016. It argues that mediators in Hong Kong have a unique interpretation of the criteria for someone to be considered a “macro-community member”. Confucian relational ethics emphasises that everyone lives in a personal nexus and wrongdoings will disturb this nexus. In this specific context, therefore, mediators feel that reconciliation and reparation should be dealt with by the people in the offender’s network while the involvement of unknown macro-community members is discouraged. Design/methodology/approach The semi-structured interview was adopted for use in this study, and an interview schedule with 12 open-ended questions was prepared as a guideline for conducting the interviews. Findings Mediators in Hong Kong have a unique interpretation of the criteria for someone to be considered a “macro-community member” Confucian relational ethics emphasises that everyone lives in a personal nexus and wrongdoings will disturb this nexus. Reconciliation and reparation should be dealt with by the people in the network, and the involvement of macro-community members will certainly disturb this network. Originality/value This study was conducted by the author between January 2015 and February 2016 for the purpose of obtaining a doctorate. The paper has neither been published previously nor is it under review for publication in any other journal at this time.
谁是宏观共同体的成员——从儒家思想的角度回答
目的本文旨在介绍和讨论2015年1月至2016年2月香港两个非政府组织的受害者-犯罪者调解会议的定性研究结果。它认为,香港的调解员对某人被视为“宏观共同体成员”的标准有着独特的解释。儒家的关系伦理强调每个人都生活在个人关系中,而错误的行为会扰乱这种关系。因此,在这种特殊情况下,调解人认为,和解和赔偿应由罪犯网络中的人处理,而不鼓励不知名的宏观社区成员参与。设计/方法/方法本研究采用半结构化访谈,并编制了一份包含12个开放式问题的访谈时间表,作为进行访谈的指南。调查结果香港的调解员对被视为“宏观社区成员”的标准有着独特的解释。儒家关系伦理强调,每个人都生活在个人关系中,错误的行为会扰乱这种关系。和解和赔偿应该由网络中的人来处理,而宏观社区成员的参与肯定会扰乱这个网络。原创性/价值本研究由作者在2015年1月至2016年2月期间进行,目的是获得博士学位。这篇论文此前既没有发表,目前也没有在任何其他期刊上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信