George Floyd and cosmopolitan memory formation in online networks: A report from Northern Europe

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION
J. Robinson
{"title":"George Floyd and cosmopolitan memory formation in online networks: A report from Northern Europe","authors":"J. Robinson","doi":"10.14198/medcom.21834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work analyses the presence and management As personalized digital networks have increased in cultural and political relevance, there is a more urgent need to understand their role in democratic memory-formation. Moreover, scholars have suggested that, in a globalized digitalized age, collective memory could extend to transnational publics. This study aims to advance the understanding of memory on global social networks by investigating the way the death of George Floyd in the summer of 2020 was treated and understood by Twitter-users outside the United States. Using a combination of big data and contemporaneous qualitative interviews with users in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, the paper brings the concept of cosmopolitan memory into the social media era. The study finds that users fused the event and its aftermath with observations of injustice in their own countries. However, this process operated differently among users of different ideological outlooks. Another key finding is that users on the radical right resented the uptake of the event as a cosmopolitan memory, and employed techniques termed as “combative counter-memory”.","PeriodicalId":43974,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mediterranea Comunicacion-Journal of Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mediterranea Comunicacion-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/medcom.21834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work analyses the presence and management As personalized digital networks have increased in cultural and political relevance, there is a more urgent need to understand their role in democratic memory-formation. Moreover, scholars have suggested that, in a globalized digitalized age, collective memory could extend to transnational publics. This study aims to advance the understanding of memory on global social networks by investigating the way the death of George Floyd in the summer of 2020 was treated and understood by Twitter-users outside the United States. Using a combination of big data and contemporaneous qualitative interviews with users in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, the paper brings the concept of cosmopolitan memory into the social media era. The study finds that users fused the event and its aftermath with observations of injustice in their own countries. However, this process operated differently among users of different ideological outlooks. Another key finding is that users on the radical right resented the uptake of the event as a cosmopolitan memory, and employed techniques termed as “combative counter-memory”.
乔治·弗洛伊德与网络世界记忆的形成——来自北欧的一份报告
随着个性化数字网络在文化和政治相关性方面的增加,更迫切需要了解它们在民主记忆形成中的作用。此外,学者们提出,在全球化的数字化时代,集体记忆可以扩展到跨国公众。这项研究旨在通过调查美国以外的twitter用户对2020年夏天乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)之死的对待和理解方式,促进对全球社交网络上记忆的理解。本文结合大数据和对挪威、瑞典和丹麦用户的同期定性访谈,将世界性记忆的概念带入了社交媒体时代。该研究发现,用户将该事件及其后果与他们自己国家的不公正现象混为一谈。然而,这一过程在不同意识形态观点的用户中运作不同。另一个重要发现是,激进右翼用户对将事件作为世界性记忆的做法感到不满,并采用了被称为“好斗的反记忆”的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信